首页> 外文期刊>Liverpool Law Review >Human Dignity and Socio-Economic Rights
【24h】

Human Dignity and Socio-Economic Rights

机译:人的尊严与社会经济权利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The South African Constitution numbers among a very few constitutions around the world which include justiciable socio-economic rights. One of the controversies surrounding judicial enforcement of such rights is the extent to which it is appropriate for courts to engage in policy choices in relation to the use of state resources in light of the doctrine of the separation of powers. The South African Constitutional Court has responded by developing an approach to adjudication of socio-economic rights in which the role of the court is to determine the reasonableness or otherwise of measures taken by the legislature and executive to implement such rights. However, the South African Constitution is also notable for its identification of human dignity as an underlying value and the explicit duty placed on the courts to interpret the rights protected under the Bill of Rights in conformity with this value. This article scrutinises the socio-economic rights jurisprudence of the South African Constitutional court in light of the Constitutional commitment to human dignity. It questions whether reasonableness review in socio-economic cases successfully balances human dignity with the appropriate degree of deference to the legislature and executive, in compliance with the doctrine of the separation of powers.
机译:南非《宪法》是世界上少数具有可诉诸社会经济权利的宪法之一。围绕此类权利的司法执行的争议之一是,法院根据三权分立的原则,在多大程度上适合就使用国家资源进行政策选择。南非宪法法院的回应是,制定了一种裁定社会经济权利的方法,该法院的作用是确定立法机关和行政机关为实现这些权利而采取的措施的合理性或其他。但是,《南非宪法》还以其将人的尊严作为基本价值而闻名,并赋予法院明确的义务,以根据这一价值来解释《人权法案》所保护的权利。本文根据宪法对人的尊严的承诺,对南非宪法法院的社会经济权利判例进行了审查。它质疑在社会经济案件中进行合理性审查是否能够在三权分立原则的基础上成功地平衡人的尊严与对立法机关和行政当局的适当尊重。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号