首页> 外文期刊>Linguistics and Philosophy >English rise-fall-rise: a study in the semantics and pragmatics of intonation
【24h】

English rise-fall-rise: a study in the semantics and pragmatics of intonation

机译:英语上升-下降-上升:语调的语义和语用研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper provides a semantic analysis of English rise-fall-rise (RFR) intonation as a focus quantifier over assertable alternative propositions. I locate RFR meaning in the conventional implicature dimension, and propose that its effect is calculated late within a dynamic model. With a minimum of machinery, this account captures disambiguation and scalar effects, as well as interactions with other focus operators like ‘only’ and clefts. Double focus data further support the analysis, and lead to a rejection of Ward and Hirschberg’s (Language 61:747–776, 1985) claim that RFR never disambiguates. Finally, I draw out connections between RFR and contrastive topic (CT) intonation (Büring, Linguist Philos 26:511–545, 2003), and show that RFR cannot simply be reduced to a sub-case of CT.
机译:本文提供了英语上升-下降-上升(RFR)语调的语义分析,作为可断言替代命题的焦点量词。我将RFR的含义定位在常规隐含维度中,并建议在动态模型的后期计算其影响。使用最少的设备,此帐户即可捕获歧义消除和标量效应,以及与其他焦点运算符(例如“ only”和“ cleft”)的交互。双焦点数据进一步支持了这一分析,并导致Ward和Hirschberg(语言61:747-776,1985)的说法遭到拒绝,RFR从来没有消除歧义。最后,我画出了RFR与对比主题语调之间的联系(Büring,Linguist Philos 26:511-545,2003),并表明RFR不能简单地归结为CT的一个子案例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号