首页> 外文期刊>Library Journal >Closing in on Open Access
【24h】

Closing in on Open Access

机译:在开放访问中关闭

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the last year, the anger and frustration simmering in libraries for a decade or more over the growing dysfunction of the scholarly communications system found a voice, a cause, and a cadre of allies around the globe. This time, the voices that said, "No" to the Big Deals were those of faculty members and academic officers at some very prestigious institutions-Cornell, Harvard, the Research Triangle institutions in North Carolina, MIT, and, for a time, the University of California. Theirs were the "no's" heard round the world when the mainstream press, intrigued no doubt by the image of academics defiantly waving nonrenewal letters in the face of corporate giants like Elsevier, picked up the stories. These universities spoke for many when they declared their intent to choose journal titles the old-fashioned way-year by year, title by title, based on the value of the con-tent rather than the size of the package.
机译:去年,由于学术交流系统日益严重的功能失调,图书馆里愤怒和沮丧消散了十多年甚至更多,在全球范围内找到了声音,原因和盟友干部。这次,对“大交易”说“不”的声音是来自一些非常负盛名的机构的教师和学术人员的声音,这些机构包括康奈尔大学,哈佛大学,北卡罗来纳州的三角研究机构,麻省理工学院。加州大学。当主流媒体对这些故事感到震惊时,主流新闻界就毫不犹豫地对他们的故事产生了兴趣,这是因为学者们像在面对像Elsevier这样的企业巨头时不停地挥舞非更新信件的形象。这些大学在宣布打算按内容的价值而不是软件包的大小逐年,逐标题地选择期刊标题时代表了很多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号