【24h】

FEEDBACK

机译:反馈

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

I have never seen a profession that so devalues itself and its credentials (Lisa Peet, "ALA Members To Vote on ED Qualifications," LJ 2/1/18, p. 24ff.). Librarians cannot even decide what to call their support staff, and some MLIS librarians are just fine with support staff having the title Librarian. Library support staff are vital, but they are not librarians. Nursing specified early on to end this confusion and chaos-and has the legal standing to back its titles up. Of course the head of the [American Library Association] should have an MLS, but, if not, then the head should have years of experience inside a library as well as a graduate degree-and even then, an MLS candidate should have preference. Would the head of the AMA not be an MD/DO? Do engineers hire non-engineers to head their professional organizations? It was bad enough when the Library of Congress head was not a librarian.
机译:我从未见过如此会贬低自身及其信誉的行业(Lisa Peet,“ ALA成员将对ED资格进行投票”,LJ 2/1/18,第24ff页)。图书馆员甚至无法决定该如何称呼其支持人员,而且某些MLIS图书馆员也很好,而支持人员的头衔是图书馆员。图书馆支持人员至关重要,但他们不是图书馆员。护理人员尽早指定了这种混淆和混乱的解决方法,并且具有法律地位来支持其职称。 [美国图书馆协会]的负责人当然应该拥有MLS,但是,如果没有,那么该负责人应该在图书馆内部具有多年的工作经验以及研究生学位,即使这样,MLS候选人也应该具有优先权。 AMA的负责人不是MD / DO吗?工程师是否雇用非工程师来领导其专业组织?当国会图书馆的负责人不是图书馆员时,这已经够糟糕了。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Library Journal》 |2018年第5期|10-10|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:17:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号