首页> 外文期刊>The Leadership & Organization Development Journal >Leadership in context: investigating hierarchical impacts on transformational leadership
【24h】

Leadership in context: investigating hierarchical impacts on transformational leadership

机译:上下文中的领导力:调查对变革型领导力的等级影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate hierarchical impacts on specific transformational leadership (TFL) behaviors (i.e. idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration).Design/methodology/approach - Survey data on TFL, job satisfaction, and hierarchy were collected from 448 managers from a multinational corporation in Sweden.Findings - Idealized influence and inspirational motivation occurred more frequently among upper rather than middle managers, while there were no differences for intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration. Also, idealized influence, inspirational motivation, and intellectual stimulation were more effective in strengthening subordinates' job satisfaction among upper rather than middle managers, while individualized consideration was similarly effective in both groups. Research limitations/implications - The cross-sectional research design precludes causal conclusions and potentially allows for common method bias. With the main research interest pertaining to hierarchical differences in TFL, however, method bias seems unlikely to fully account for the results.Practical implications - Study results emphasize the necessity to strengthen TFL on lower managerial levels. Organizations might achieve this by cutting administrative constraints and empowering lower level leaders.Originality/value - The study addresses repeated calls for a consideration of contextual factors in TFL research. It points to the role of hierarchy as a boundary condition of TFL.
机译:目的-本文的目的是根据经验研究分层变革对特定变革型领导(TFL)行为(即理想化影响,鼓舞动机,智力激发和个性化考虑)的影响。设计/方法/方法-关于TFL,工作满意度的调查数据从瑞典的一家跨国公司的448位经理中收集了等级和等级。发现-理想化的影响力和鼓舞性动机发生在高层管理者而非中层管理者中,而在智力刺激和个性化考虑上没有差异。同样,理想化的影响力,鼓舞性动机和智力刺激在增强下级而非中层管理者的下属工作满意度方面更有效,而个性化的考虑在两组中同样有效。研究的局限性/含义-横断面研究设计排除了因果关系的结论,并可能允许常见的方法偏见。然而,由于主要的研究兴趣在于TFL的等级差异,因此方法偏差似乎不太可能完全说明结果。实际意义-研究结果强调了在较低管理水平上加强TFL的必要性。组织可以通过减少行政约束和授权较低级别的领导者来实现这一目标。原创性/价值-该研究提出了在TFL研究中反复考虑环境因素的呼吁。它指出了层次作为TFL边界条件的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号