首页> 外文期刊>Language Awareness >Are alphabetic language -derived models of L2 reading relevant to L1 logographic background readers?
【24h】

Are alphabetic language -derived models of L2 reading relevant to L1 logographic background readers?

机译:L2阅读的字母语言衍生模型是否与L1 Logographic背景阅读器相关?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this paper, we argue that second language (L2) reading research, which has been informed by studies involving first language (L1) alphabetic English reading, may be less relevant to L2 readers with non-alphabetic reading backgrounds, such as Chinese readers with an L1 logographic (Chinese character) learning history. We provide both neuroanatomical and behavioural evidence from Chinese language reading studies to support our claims. The paper concludes with an argument outlining the need for a universal L2 reading model which can adequately account for readers with diverse L1 orthographic language learning histories.
机译:在本文中,我们认为,第二语言(L2)阅读研究(已由涉及第一语言(L1)字母英语阅读的研究提供了信息)可能与具有非字母阅读背景的L2读者(例如,具有英语的中国读者)相关性较低。 L1逻辑记录(汉字)学习历史。我们提供中文阅读研究的神经解剖学和行为学证据,以支持我们的主张。本文以一个论点作为结束语,概述了对通用的L2阅读模型的需求,该模型可以充分考虑具有不同的L1正交语言学习历史的读者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号