首页> 外文期刊>Language Assessment Quarterly >Structural Equation Modeling in Language Testing and Learning Research: A Review
【24h】

Structural Equation Modeling in Language Testing and Learning Research: A Review

机译:语言测试和学习研究中的结构方程建模:综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite the recent increase of structural equation modeling (SEM) in language testing and learning research and Kunnan's (1998)59. Kunnan, A. J. 1998. An introduction to structural equation modelling for language assessment research. Language Testing, 15: 295-332. [CSA]View all references call for the proper use of SEM to produce useful findings, there seem to be no reviews about how SEM is applied in these areas or about the extent to which the current application accords with appropriate practices. To narrow these gaps, we investigated the characteristics of the use of SEM in language testing and learning research. Electronic and manual searches of 20 journals revealed 50 articles containing a total of 360 models analyzed using SEM. We discovered that SEM was most often used to investigate learners' strategy use and trait/test structure. Maximum likelihood methods were most often used to estimate parameters of a model; model fit indices of chi-squares, comparative fit index, root mean square error of approximation, and Tucker-Lewis index were often reported, but standardized root mean square residual rarely was. Univariate and multivariate normality checks were infrequently reported, as was missing data treatment. Sample sizes, when judged according to Kline's (200556. Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd, New York, NY: Guilford. View all references) and Raykov and Marcoulides's (200656. Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd, New York, NY: Guilford. View all references) guidelines, were in most cases adequate, and LISREL was the most widely used program. Two recommendations are provided for the better practice of using and reporting SEM for language testing and learning research.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.582203
机译:尽管最近在语言测试和学习研究中以及在Kunnan(1998)59中增加了结构方程模型(SEM)。 Kunnan,A. J.1998。对语言评估研究的结构方程建模的介绍。语言测试,15:295-332。 [CSA]查看所有参考文献都要求适当使用SEM来产生有用的发现,但似乎没有关于SEM在这些领域的应用方式或当前应用在多大程度上符合适当实践的评论。为了缩小这些差距,我们调查了在语言测试和学习研究中使用SEM的特征。电子和手动搜索20种期刊显示50篇文章,包含使用SEM分析的总共360种模型。我们发现SEM最常用于研究学习者的策略使用和特质/测试结构。最大似然法最常用于估计模型的参数。经常报告卡方的模型拟合指数,比较拟合指数,近似均方根误差和Tucker-Lewis指数,但很少有标准化均方根残差。很少报告单变量和多变量正态性检查,也缺少数据处理。根据Kline(200556. Kline,RB2005。结构方程模型的原理和实践,第二版,纽约,纽约:吉尔福德。查看所有参考文献)和Raykov和Marcoulides(200656. Kline,RB 2005.原理)进行判断的样本量。和结构方程模型的实践,第二版,纽约,纽约:吉尔福德(查看所有参考文献)指南,在大多数情况下是足够的,并且LISREL是使用最广泛的程序。针对使用和报告SEM进行语言测试和学习研究的更好做法,提供了两项建议。查看全文下载全文相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious ,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.582203

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号