首页> 外文期刊>Language and education >Literacy Under and Over the Desk: Oppositions and Heterogeneity
【24h】

Literacy Under and Over the Desk: Oppositions and Heterogeneity

机译:台下和台下的扫盲:反对与异质性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper I argue that a dominant theme in New Literacy Studies research, the differences between literacy practices inside and outside school, has sometimes involved conflating 'home literacy' with private, unregulated 'vernacular literacy', and the use of an idealised abstract notion of schooled literacy to represent students' actual everyday experience in the classroom. Drawing on linguistic ethnographic research in two British primary schools, I use examples of 'unofficial' and 'official' literacy activities from 10-11-year-olds to show that a wide range of different forms of literacy can be found in the classroom and I argue that the division between 'vernacular' and 'schooled' is not as clear-cut as is sometimes assumed. My analysis of children's literacy activities suggests that, on the one hand, unofficial activities orientate towards and index official knowledges and the macro-level institutional order and, on the other hand, official activities are interpenetrated with informal practices and procedures. I also comment on some implications of using the New Literacy Studies 'events and practices' conceptual framework for understanding what is going on in classrooms.
机译:在本文中,我认为,新素养研究的一个主要主题,即学校内部和外部识字实践之间的差异,有时涉及将“家庭识字”与私人的,不受监管的“白话识字”混为一谈,以及使用理想化的抽象概念的文化素养代表学生在课堂上的实际日常经历。借鉴英国两所小学的语言人种学研究,我以10至11岁儿童的“非官方”和“官方”扫盲活动为例,表明可以在课堂上找到各种不同形式的识字我认为“乡土”和“受过教育”之间的区分不像有时所假定的那样清晰。我对儿童扫盲活动的分析表明,一方面,非官方活动面向并索引官方知识和宏观制度秩序,另一方面,官方活动与非正式实践和程序相互渗透。我还评论了使用“新素养研究”的“事件和实践”概念框架来理解教室中正在发生的事情的一些含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号