...
首页> 外文期刊>KSCE journal of civil engineering >Review and Improvement Direction of the Riprap Design Standard for Fill Dams in Korea
【24h】

Review and Improvement Direction of the Riprap Design Standard for Fill Dams in Korea

机译:韩国填补水坝撕裂设计标准的审查和改进方向

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Since domestic reservoirs are mainly soil-fill dams, slope protection measures are necessary to prevent erosion, weathering, and wave-induced loss of soil, and riprap is the most common slope protection method. Although design standards for riprap at fill dams are provided in National Design Standard of Korea, they use out-of-date criteria based largely on overseas standards that may not be applicable to the Korean context. This study aimed to identify problems with the current design standards by comparing them with overseas standards, and to suggest directions for improving Korean standards through investigations of existing embankments. The review found that domestic design standards restrict the quality and maximum particle size of stone used for riprap. Much of the design criteria are based on past surveys of the performance record for fill dams conducted by the US Army Corps of Engineers. So this can be unsuitable for changes in modern technology and environmental conditions in Korea. More recent design trends suggest riprap size using an experimental formula, which is numerically different from the data presented in domestic design standards, and this may lead to unstable and uneconomic dams. In addition, various factors such as the shape, weight, and gradation of the riprap can also have a strong influence on riprap stability. The results of the survey show that current condition of the riprap protection is different from the domestic design standard, but it is judged that the stability is satisfied with the overseas design standards. In the field survey, 12 sites were selected in consideration of regional distribution. The results of the survey show that current condition of the riprap protection is different from the domestic design standard, but it is judged that the stability is satisfied with the overseas design standards.
机译:由于国内水库主要是土壤 - 填充水坝,因此需要坡度保护措施来防止侵蚀,风化和波浪引起的土壤丧失,而RIPRAP是最常见的斜坡保护方法。虽然填补水坝的RIPRAP设计标准是在韩国国家设计标准中提供的,但它们主要根据海外标准的超出日期标准,这可能不适用于韩国背景。本研究旨在通过将其与海外标准进行比较,并通过调查现有堤防来建议改善韩国标准的指示,确定目前的设计标准的问题。审查发现,国内设计标准限制了用于撕裂的石材的质量和最大粒径。大部分设计标准都是基于美国陆军工程兵团填充水坝的过去调查。因此,这可能不适合韩国现代技术和环境条件的变化。最近的设计趋势建议使用实验公式的抛物尺寸,其与国内设计标准中提出的数据不同,这可能导致不稳定和不经济的水坝。此外,各种因素如撕裂的形状,重量和渐变也可以对撕裂稳定性产生强烈影响。调查结果表明,RIPRAP保护的现状与国内设计标准不同,但判断稳定性对海外设计标准满意。在现场调查中,考虑到区域分布选择12个网站。调查结果表明,RIPRAP保护的现状与国内设计标准不同,但判断稳定性对海外设计标准满意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号