首页> 外文期刊>Knowledge-Based Systems >Classifiers consensus system approach for credit scoring
【24h】

Classifiers consensus system approach for credit scoring

机译:分类器共识系统的信用评分方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Banks take great care when dealing with customer loans to avoid any improper decisions that can lead to loss of opportunity or financial losses. Regarding this, researchers have developed complex credit scoring models using statistical and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to help banks and financial institutions to support their financial decisions. Various models, from easy to advanced approaches, have been developed in this domain. However, during the last few years there has been marked attention towards development of ensemble or multiple classifier systems, which have proved their ability to be more accurate than single classifier models. However, among the multiple classifier systems models developed in the literature, there has been little consideration given to: 1) combining classifiers of different algorithms (as most have focused on building classifiers of the same algorithm); or 2) exploring different classifier output combination techniques other than the traditional ones, such as majority voting and weighted average. In this paper, the aim is to present a new combination approach based on classifier consensus to combine multiple classifier systems (MCS) of different classification algorithms. Specifically, six of the main well-known base classifiers in this domain are used, namely, logistic regression (LR), neural networks (NN), support vector machines (SVM), random forests (RF), decision trees (DT) and naive Bayes (NB). Two benchmark classifiers are considered as a reference point for comparison with the proposed method and the other classifiers. These are used in combination with LR, which is still considered the industry-standard model for credit scoring models, and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), a widely adopted technique in credit scoring studies. The experimental results, analysis and statistical tests demonstrate the ability of the proposed combination method to improve prediction performance against all base classifiers, namely, LR, MARS and seven traditional combination methods, in terms of average accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), the H-measure and Brier score (BS). The model was validated over five real-world credit scoring datasets. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:银行在处理客户贷款时要格外小心,以避免可能导致机会损失或财务损失的任何不当决定。对此,研究人员使用统计和人工智能(AI)技术开发了复杂的信用评分模型,以帮助银行和金融机构支持其财务决策。在此领域,已经开发了各种模型,从简单到高级的方法。然而,在最近几年中,已经对集成或多个分类器系统的开发给予了极大的关注,事实证明它们具有比单个分类器模型更准确的能力。但是,在文献中开发的多个分类器系统模型中,很少考虑:1)组合不同算法的分类器(因为大多数都集中在构建相同算法的分类器上);或2)探索不同于传统的分类器输出组合技术,例如多数表决和加权平均。本文的目的是提出一种基于分类器共识的新组合方法,以组合不同分类算法的多个分类器系统(MCS)。具体而言,使用了该领域中的六个主要的知名基本分类器,即逻辑回归(LR),神经网络(NN),支持向量机(SVM),随机森林(RF),决策树(DT)和朴素贝叶斯(NB)。将两个基准分类器作为参考点,以与所提出的方法和其他分类器进行比较。这些与LR(仍然被认为是信用评分模型的行业标准模型)和多元自适应回归样条(MARS)结合使用,MARS是信用评分研究中广泛采用的技术。实验结果,分析和统计测试证明了所提出的组合方法针对所有基本分类器(即LR,MARS和7种传统组合方法)在平均准确度,曲线下面积(AUC), H度量和Brier分数(BS)。该模型在五个真实世界的信用评分数据集上得到了验证。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号