首页> 外文期刊>Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy >Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison of tendon graft repairs to a synthetic double bundle augmentation
【24h】

Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison of tendon graft repairs to a synthetic double bundle augmentation

机译:锁骨韧带重建:腱移植物修复与合成双束增强的生物力学比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For currently presented anatomical coracoclavicular ligament repairs issues such as autologous tendon graft versus synthetic suture augmentation and the optimum fixation strategies for both types of reconstruction are not solved. The purpose of the study was to compare the biomechanical properties of different tendon graft repairs to the characteristics of a synthetic polyester augmentation. Four anatomical coracoclavicular ligament repairs were biomechanically tested: 5 mm coracoclavicular tendon loop with suture fixation, tendon loop with flip button fixation, tendon loop with interference screw fixation versus a double 1.0-mm polyester repair with flip button fixation. The biomechanical testing included cyclic superio-inferior loading and a subsequent load to failure protocol. The ultimate failure loads were significantly higher for the double polyester/flip button repair (927 N) compared to all tendon repair techniques (maximum 640 N). In contrast the stiffness level was higher for the tendon repairs compared to the polyester/flip button repair (68.7 N/mm) but strongly dependent on the fixation technique (interference screw 97.2 N/mm, flip button 84.9 N/mm, side to side suture 60.9 N/mm). A synthetic coracoclavicular augmentation using a polyester suture provides adequate structural properties compared to a tendon repair. Therefore the decision for a tendon graft should be made by the necessity of a biologic substrate rather than by the assumption of a biomechanical advantage.
机译:对于当前提出的解剖性锁骨韧带修复问题,例如自体肌腱移植与合成缝合线缝合以及两种重建类型的最佳固定策略均未解决。该研究的目的是将不同的肌腱移植修复物的生物力学性能与合成聚酯增强材料的特征进行比较。生物力学测试了四项解剖性的锁骨韧带修复术:缝合固定的5 mm锁骨肌腱环,翻转固定的肌腱环,干涉螺钉固定的肌腱环与翻转固定的1.0 mm双聚酯修复。生物力学测试包括循环上下次加载以及后续的失效协议加载。与所有肌腱修复技术(最大640 N)相比,双聚酯/翻转按钮修复的最终破坏载荷明显更高(927 N)。相反,与聚酯/翻钮修复相比,腱修复的刚度更高(68.7 N / mm),但在很大程度上取决于固定技术(干涉螺钉97.2 N / mm,翻钮84.9 N / mm,左右)缝线60.9 N / mm)。与肌腱修复术相比,使用聚酯缝合线进行的合成锁骨锁骨增强术提供了足够的结构特性。因此,肌腱移植的决定应由生物基质的必要性决定,而不是由生物力学优势的假设决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号