首页> 外文期刊>JPKE: Journal of Post Keynesian Economics >Deficit reduction, the age of austerity,and the paradox of insolvency
【24h】

Deficit reduction, the age of austerity,and the paradox of insolvency

机译:赤字减少,紧缩的时代和破产的悖论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The European debt crisis in 2010 resulted in the adoption of fiscal austerity measures in many European economies, and produced demands for the adoption of similar policies in the United States. This paper examines whether the implementation of immediate fiscal austerity during a fragile economic recovery is justified and whether it is the best means of achieving deficit reduction. The paper points out that although the austerity strategy can lead to deficit reduction and prevent insolvency in the case of an indebted individual, this may not necessarily be the outcome in the case of national indebtedness. The problem is accentuated when austerity measures are replicated in many interdependent economies. The paradox is in general valid when it is assumed that fiscal policy is effective and that fiscal multipliers are positive, assumptions that the New Consensus Macroeconomics theoretical framework that underpins the austerity strategy, inappropriately, rejects. The overall conclusion is that "synchronized" fiscal austerity cannot solve the problem of ballooning public debts that need to be tackled in conjunction with attempts to reform the international banking and financial system.
机译:2010年的欧洲债务危机导致许多欧洲经济体采取了财政紧缩措施,并对美国采取类似政策提出了要求。本文研究了在脆弱的经济复苏期间实施紧缩的财政紧缩政策是否合理,以及是否是减少赤字的最佳手段。该论文指出,尽管紧缩战略可以减少负债的情况并防止破产,但对于举债的人来说,这不一定是结果。当在许多相互依存的经济体中实行紧缩措施时,问题就更加突出了。当假设财政政策是有效的并且财政乘数是正的,并且假设紧缩战略的基础的新共识宏观经济学理论框架被不恰当地拒绝时,这种悖论通常是有效的。总的结论是,“同步”的财政紧缩措施无法解决公共债务激增的问题,而这需要与改革国际银行和金融体系的尝试一起解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号