首页> 外文期刊>Journalism Studies >“THE SUPREMACY OF IGNORANCE OVER INSTRUCTION AND OF NUMBERS OVER KNOWLEDGE”
【24h】

“THE SUPREMACY OF IGNORANCE OVER INSTRUCTION AND OF NUMBERS OVER KNOWLEDGE”

机译:“对指令的无知和对知识的无数”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

I argue that a divergence between popular culture as “object” and “subject” of journalism emerged during the 19th century in Britain. It accounts not only for different practices of journalism, but also for differences in the study of journalism, as manifested in journalism studies and cultural studies, respectively. The paper offers an historical account to show that popular culture was the source of the first mass circulation journalism, via the pauper press, but that it was later incorporated into the mechanisms of modern government for a very different purpose, the theorist of which was Walter Bagehot. Journalism's polarity was reversed—it turned from “subjective” to “objective.” The paper concludes with a discussion of YouTube and the resurgence of self-representation, using the resources of popular culture, in current election campaigns. Are we witnessing a further reversal of polarity, where popular culture and self-representation once again becomes the “subject” of journalism?
机译:我认为,在19世纪英国,流行文化作为新闻的“对象”与“主题”之间出现了分歧。它不仅解释了新闻学的不同实践,而且解释了新闻学研究和文化研究中分别表现出的新闻学差异。该论文提供了一个历史记录,表明通过贫乏新闻界,大众文化是第一批大众传播新闻的源头,但后来又出于不同的目的将其纳入现代政府的机制中,其理论家是沃尔特。巴热特新闻业的极性被颠倒了—从“主观”转变为“客观”。本文最后讨论了YouTube,以及在当前的竞选活动中利用流行文化的资源重新展现了自我代表。我们是否正在看到极性的进一步逆转,大众文化和自我代表再次成为新闻的“主体”?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号