...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research >The use of belief-based probabilistic methods in volcanology: Scientists' views and implications for risk assessments
【24h】

The use of belief-based probabilistic methods in volcanology: Scientists' views and implications for risk assessments

机译:火山学中基于信念的概率方法的使用:科学家的观点及其对风险评估的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper constitutes a philosophical and social scientific study of expert elicitation in the assessment and management of volcanic risk on Montserrat during the 1995-present volcanic activity. It outlines the broader context of subjective probabilistic methods and then uses a mixed-method approach to analyse the use of these methods in volcanic crises. Data from a global survey of volcanologists regarding the use of statistical methods in hazard assessment are presented. Detailed qualitative data from Montserrat are then discussed, particularly concerning the expert elicitation procedure that was pioneered during the eruptions. These data are analysed and conclusions about the use of these methods in volcanology are drawn. The paper finds that while many volcanologists are open to the use of these methods, there are still some concerns, which are similar to the concerns encountered in the literature on probabilistic and determinist approaches to seismic hazard analysis.
机译:本文构成了在1995年至今的火山活动中评估和管理蒙特塞拉特火山风险的专家启发的哲学和社会科学研究。它概述了主观概率方法的更广泛上下文,然后使用混合方法分析了火山危机中这些方法的使用。给出了来自全球火山学家调查的有关在危险性评估中使用统计方法的数据。然后讨论了来自蒙特塞拉特(Montserrat)的详细定性数据,特别是有关喷发过程中所倡导的专家引诱程序的信息。分析这些数据并得出有关在火山学中使用这些方法的结论。该论文发现,尽管许多火山学家对使用这些方法持开放态度,但仍然存在一些担忧,这些担忧与文献中关于概率和确定性方法进行地震危险性分析所遇到的担忧相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号