首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vocational behavior >Compromise in career decision making: A test of Gottfredson's theory
【24h】

Compromise in career decision making: A test of Gottfredson's theory

机译:损害职业决策:对戈特弗雷德森理论的检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present study tested Gottfredson's revised theory of circumscription and compromise. Consistent with the theory, it was predicted that individuals engaging in a low degree of compromise would place greatest importance on interests followed by prestige, and then sex-type. In a moderate degree of compromise situation, it was expected that individuals would place greatest importance on prestige followed by interests, and then sex-type. For individuals engaging in a high degree of compromise, sex-type was hypothesized to be most important followed by prestige, and then interests. Using a heterogeneous sample of 119 university students, partial support for Gottfredson's (1996) revised theory was found. Participants engaging in a low degree of career compromise placed greatest importance on interests, followed by prestige, and then sex-type. However, within the moderate and high compromise conditions, there were no significant differences between prestige and sex-type, although both were significantly greater than interests. It was concluded that more research investigating these changes is needed.
机译:本研究检验了戈特弗雷德森(Gottfredson)修订后的限制与妥协理论。与该理论一致的是,据预测,参与程度较低的妥协的个人将首先重视利益,其次是声望,然后是性别类型。在中等程度的妥协情况下,人们期望个人将最重视信誉,其次是兴趣,然后是性别类型。对于高度折衷的个人,性别类型被认为是最重要的,其次是声望,然后是兴趣。使用119名大学生的不同样本,发现对Gottfredson(1996)修订理论的部分支持。参加职业折衷程度低的参与者最重视兴趣,其次是声望,然后是性别类型。然而,在中度和高度妥协条件下,声望和性别类型之间没有显着差异,尽管两者都显着大于兴趣。结论是,需要更多研究这些变化的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号