...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Urban Health >Reconsidering the Effects of Poverty and Social Support on Health: A 5-Year Longitudinal Test of the Stress-Buffering Hypothesis
【24h】

Reconsidering the Effects of Poverty and Social Support on Health: A 5-Year Longitudinal Test of the Stress-Buffering Hypothesis

机译:重新考虑贫困和社会支持对健康的影响:压力缓冲假说的5年纵向检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prior research in the general population has found that social support can buffer the adverse effects of stressors on health. However, both stressors and social support may be qualitatively different for those living in urban poverty. We examined the effects of social support and poverty-specific stressors on self-rated health. We used data from the Welfare Client Longitudinal Survey (WCLS), a 5-year longitudinal study of 718 public aid recipients. We measured received social support and “net social support,” defined as the difference between support received and that given to others. We used restricted cubic splines to model the stress-buffering effects of social support on self-rated health as a function of stressful life events and neighborhood disorder. Increased exposure to stressors was associated with poorer self-rated health. Evidence of stress buffering was confined to those with the heaviest exposure to stressors, and its effects decreased across increasing levels of social support. Analyses using net social support had generally more modest effects than those using received social support. Social support does not buffer the effects of stressors on health uniformly for individuals living in conditions of urban poverty. Researchers and policymakers should be cautious in overestimating the beneficial effects that social support may have on health for marginalized populations.
机译:在一般人群中的先前研究发现,社会支持可以缓解压力源对健康的不利影响。但是,对于生活在城市贫困中的人们来说,压力和社会支持在质上都可能有所不同。我们研究了社会支持和针对贫困人群的压力源对自测健康的影响。我们使用了来自福利客户纵向调查(WCLS)的数据,该调查对718名公共援助接受者进行了为期5年的纵向研究。我们测量了获得的社会支持和“净社会支持”,定义为获得的支持与给予他人的支持之间的差额。我们使用受限三次样条来模拟社会支持对自我评估健康的压力缓冲效果,作为压力生活事件和邻里障碍的函数。压力源暴露的增加与自我评估的健康状况较差有关。压力缓冲的证据仅限于那些承受最大压力的人,其影响随着社会支持水平的提高而降低。与使用获得的社会支持的分析相比,使用净社会支持的分析通常效果较小。社会支持不能缓解压力源对生活在城市贫困条件下的个人健康的影响。研究人员和政策制定者应谨慎估计社会支持可能对边缘化人群的健康产生的有益影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号