首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ultrasound >Study of ultrasound‑guided needle aspiration and catheter drainage in the management of liver abscesses
【24h】

Study of ultrasound‑guided needle aspiration and catheter drainage in the management of liver abscesses

机译:肝脏脓肿管理中超声引导针吸附和导管引流的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose To evaluate and compare the efficacy of intermittent needle aspiration and continuous catheter drainage in ultrasound- guided management of liver abscesses. Methods This was a prospective, randomised study conducted on 100 patients (88 males and 12 females; age range 22–74 years) with liver abscess(es) and having abscess size more than 5 cm, divided into two groups: Percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) (n = 50) and percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) (n = 50). Criteria of exclusion were: rupture of abscess before intervention; prior intervention; uncorrectable coagulopathy; concomitant biliary tract malignancy. In the PNA group, pus was aspirated by an 18-gauge needle using freehand technique and the number of aspirations was limited to two. Failure of abscess size to decline below 50% of the original diameter or of clinical improvement after second aspiration was considered as failure of aspiration. In the PCD group, drainage was done by 12-French catheters using Seldinger technique. Drainage was considered as failure if abscess cavity did not resolve and laparotomy was needed to evacuate the pus cavity. Result The success rate in the PNA group was 88% and 92% in the PCD group; however, this difference was statistically not significant, suggesting that both are equally efficacious. The total duration of hospital stay (mean 6.8 days [PNA] vs 10.5 days [PCD]; p value: 0.011) and the average duration between intervention and discharge (5.9 days [PNA] vs 10.2 days [PCD]; p value:0.026) were significantly less in the PNA group. One major complication was seen in our study: peritonitis due to peri-catheter leak in PCD group. Conclusion Both procedures are equally efficacious in the management of liver abscesses; however in view of less duration of hospital stay, patient safety and comfort, procedure simplicity, and the reduced cost, needle aspiration should be used as the first-line procedure in the treatment of liver abscess (even in abscesses more than 5 cm). Catheter drainage should be reserved for cases that do not respond to a second attempt of aspiration.
机译:目的是评估和比较间歇针吸入和连续导管引流在肝脏脓肿超声波导向管理中的疗效。方法这是100名患者(88名男性和12名女性)进行的前瞻性随机研究,肝脏脓肿(22-74岁)和脓肿大小超过5厘米,分为两组:经皮针抱负( PNA)(n = 50)和经皮导管引流(PCD)(n = 50)。排除标准是:干预前的脓肿破裂;先前干预;不可纠正的凝血病;伴随胆道恶性肿瘤。在PNA组中,使用手法技术通过18号针吸出PU,并且举射的数量限制为两个。脓肿尺寸的失败下降低于原始直径的50%或临床改善后,第二次抽吸后被认为是吸入的失败。在PCD组中,引流由12-法国导管使用Seldinger技术完成。如果脓肿腔没有分辨,并且需要剖腹度疏散脓腔,则被认为是失败的。结果PCD组PNA组成功率为88%和92%;然而,这种差异在统计上并不重要,这表明两者都同样有效。住院住院的总持续时间(平均6.8天[PNA] VS 10.5天[PCD]; P值:0.011)和干预和放电之间的平均持续时间(5.9天[PNA]与10.2天[PCD]; P值:0.026 )PNA组在显着较低。我们的研究中可以看到一种主要的并发症:由于PCD组的Peri导管泄漏,腹膜炎。结论两种程序在肝脏脓肿管理方面同样有效;然而,考虑到较少的住院住院持续时间,患者安全性和舒适性,程序简单,成本降低,应将针吸吸为肝脏脓肿治疗中的一线过程(即使在5厘米的脓肿中)。应保留导管排水,以便在不响应愿望的第二次尝试的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号