首页> 外文期刊>Journal of travel research >The Effects of Social Influence and Cognitive Dissonance on Travel Purchase Decisions
【24h】

The Effects of Social Influence and Cognitive Dissonance on Travel Purchase Decisions

机译:社会影响力和认知失调对旅行购买决策的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Theories of social influence (Crano 2000) and cognitive dissonance (Festinger 1957) have clear applicability to travel purchases, but have rarely been investigated in hospitality research. An experimental study of students' travel decisions for a spring break vacation was conducted. Subjects chose between a green and nongreen resort in a 2 x 3 experimental design that manipulated social influence (majority, minority, none) and pro-environmental attitudes (high or low). Social influence was in the form of traveler reviews that were either favorable or unfavorable. Postdecision dissonance and dissonance reduction tactics were measured. Subjects were less likely to choose a green resort when a minority of reviews favored that resort. Subjects with strong pro-environmental attitudes experienced dissonance when making a nongreen choice in this situation. Consistent with dissonance theory predictions, people evaluated the chosen resort more favorably than the alternative. They sought out more favorable information about the resort when they experienced dissonance.
机译:社会影响力理论(Crano 2000)和认知失调理论(Festinger 1957)在旅行购买中具有明显的适用性,但很少在酒店研究中进行研究。进行了关于学生春假假期旅行决策的实验研究。受试者通过2 x 3的实验设计在绿色和非绿色度假村之间进行选择,该方案可操纵社会影响力(多数,少数,无)和亲环境态度(高或低)。社会影响力以旅客评论的形式出现,无论是有利还是不利。测量了决策后的失谐和减少失谐的策略。当少数评论偏向绿色度假胜地时,受试者选择绿色度假胜地的可能性较小。在这种情况下做出非绿色选择时,具有强烈的环保意识的对象会感到不和谐。与不和谐理论的预测相一致,人们对选择的度假胜地的评价比其他选择更为有利。当他们感到不和谐时,他们寻求了关于度假村的更有利的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号