...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transport Geography >Context sensitive multimodal road planning: a case study in Cape Town,South Africa
【24h】

Context sensitive multimodal road planning: a case study in Cape Town,South Africa

机译:上下文相关的多式联运道路规划:以南非开普敦为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Road planning practice relies almost exclusively on parameters related to traffic factors, such as private vehicle speeds and volumes. In many developing countries the requirements for public transport and non-motorised transport are not explicitly integrated into the planning process, despite the fact that these form the primary mode of transport for the majority of the population. This affects the mobility opportunities for these sectors of the population and contributes to poor road safety, especially with regards to pedestrians. The research outlined in the paper posits that, in order to assess the usage and needs of the road holistically, other factors related to the adjacent land uses, socio-economic characteristics of the population the road serves, and the environmental context within which the road is located, factors heavily in how the road is used and should, therefore, be considered within the planning process. The paper describes a methodology to include these factors in the planning of roads. The method attempts to prioritise amongst the five primary road based modes (public transport, car, freight, walking and cycling) based upon a combination of traffic and non-traffic factors. The method employed uses a geographic information system (CIS) based spatial multiple criteria evaluation (SMCE) model with inputs from widely available data sources such as census, household travel surveys, land use and environmental data to arrive at solutions for modal priorities. A case study is conducted along an arterial route in Cape Town, South Africa, providing infrastructure planning recommendations and audit possibilities for the future. Since weighting is an important driver in the SMCE process, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to investigate the effect of alternative weighting schemes on the outputs from the method.
机译:道路规划实践几乎完全依赖与交通因素相关的参数,例如私家车的速度和数量。在许多发展中国家,尽管公共交通和非机动交通是大多数人的主要交通方式,但并未明确将其纳入规划过程。这影响了这些人口阶层的出行机会,并导致道路安全性差,尤其是对行人而言。本文概述的研究认为,为了从整体上评估道路的使用和需求,其他与邻近土地用途,道路服务人口的社会经济特征以及道路所处的环境相关的因素道路的位置非常重要,因此在规划过程中应考虑这些因素。本文介绍了一种将这些因素纳入道路规划的方法。该方法尝试基于交通和非交通因素的组合在五个主要的基于道路的模式(公共交通,汽车,货运,步行和骑自行车)中确定优先级。所采用的方法使用基于地理信息系统(CIS)的空间多标准评估(SMCE)模型,并从广泛可用的数据源(例如普查,家庭旅行调查,土地使用和环境数据)获得输入,以得出模式优先级的解决方案。在南非开普敦的一条动脉路线上进行了案例研究,提供了基础设施规划建议以及未来的审计可能性。由于加权是SMCE流程中的重要驱动因素,因此进行了敏感性分析,以研究替代加权方案对方法输出的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号