首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transport Geography >Competing institutional logics and institutional erosion in environmental governance of maritime transport
【24h】

Competing institutional logics and institutional erosion in environmental governance of maritime transport

机译:竞争制度逻辑和环境治理环境治理的制度侵蚀

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper explores the process of deinstitutionalization of maritime transport governance due to competing institutional logics. The sector continues to operate with a business-as-usual logic while simultaneously paying lip service to a logic of sustainability. The key regulator of the sector, the International Maritime Organization (IMO), attempts to bring in stricter environmental legislation, but the dominant logic will not allow these developments. At the same time, the sustainability logic driven by peripheral actors cannot achieve domination. This leads to an ongoing erosion of the legitimacy of the institution of maritime transport governance and a state of inertia with no new institution able to emerge. This stagnation is, in some ways, worse than a decline because current issues cannot be addressed, leading to a loss of trust in the system, further stagnation and impasse, and no action on GHG emissions.
机译:本文探讨了由于竞争制度逻辑因竞争而导致的海上运输治理的过程。 该部门继续使用常用逻辑运营,同时向可持续性逻辑支付唇部服务。 该部门的主要监管机构,国际海运组织(IMO),试图引进更严格的环境立法,但主导逻辑不允许这些发展。 同时,外围演员驱动的可持续发展逻辑无法达到统治。 这导致了海上运输治理机构的合法性和惯性状态的持续侵蚀,没有能够出现新机构的惯性。 这种停滞在某种程度上,比下降更糟糕,因为目前的问题无法解决,导致制度的信任丧失,进一步的停滞和僵局,没有对温室气体排放的行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号