首页> 外文期刊>Journal of tourism and cultural change >Should I stay or should I go? Negotiating township tours in post-apartheid South Africa
【24h】

Should I stay or should I go? Negotiating township tours in post-apartheid South Africa

机译:我应该走还是留?种族隔离后南非的乡镇旅游谈判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article focuses on township tours outside Cape Town and Johannesburg during the past decade. By examining the subjectivities of guides and tourists, as well as public discourses about townships, I argue that township tours are ethically problematic and ambiguous, but do not go uncontested. Questions about voyeurism and development are negotiated during the tours in a number of ways. First, the morality of witnessing townships - not through the modality of vision, but through participating in contact zones - is asserted. Second, public discourses that valourize the creativity of the poor, and which harness history as a force for reconciliation and development, inform the tours. Third, tour guides attempt to reform charity and to highlight ethical consumption. An ethnographic and discursive analysis leads me to conclude that township tours are part of a larger post-apartheid project of re-imagining and remaking marginalized urban spaces.
机译:本文重点介绍了过去十年来开普敦和约翰内斯堡以外的乡镇旅游。通过研究导游和游客的主观性以及有关乡镇的公共话语,我认为乡镇游览在伦理上是有问题的,模棱两可的,但并非毫无争议。在旅行期间,会以多种方式商讨有关偷窥和发展的问题。首先,宣称见证城镇的道德不是通过视觉的方式,而是通过参与接触区来实现的。其次,公开演讲充实了穷人的创造力,并利用历史作为和解与发展的力量,为旅行团提供了信息。第三,导游试图改革慈善事业并强调道德消费。一项人种学和话语分析使我得出结论,乡镇游览是种族隔离之后的重新想象和改造边缘化城市空间的一个较大项目的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号