首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Chemical Society >Evidence for Quantum Interference in SAMs of Arylethynylene Thiolates in Tunneling Junctions with Eutectic Ga-ln (EGaln) Top-Contacts
【24h】

Evidence for Quantum Interference in SAMs of Arylethynylene Thiolates in Tunneling Junctions with Eutectic Ga-ln (EGaln) Top-Contacts

机译:共晶Ga-In(EGaln)顶部触点在隧道结中对亚芳基乙炔硫醇盐的SAM进行量子干扰的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper compares the current density (J) versus applied bias (V) of self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of three different ethynylthiophenol-functionalized anthracene derivatives of approximately the same thickness with linear-conjugation (AC), cross-conjugation (AQ), and broken-conjugation (AH) using liquid eutectic Ga—In (EGaln) supporting a native skin (~1 nm thick) of Ga_2O_3 as a nondamaging, conformal top-contact. This skin imparts non-Newtonian rheological properties that distinguish EGaln from other top-contacts; however, it may also have limited the maximum values of/ observed for AC. The measured values ot J tor AH and AQ,are not significantly different (J≈ 10~(-1) A/cm~2 at V = 0.4 V;.For AC, however, J is 1 (using log averages) or 2 (using Gaussian fits) orders of magnitude higher than for AH and AQ. These values are in good qualitative agreement with gDFTB calculations on single AC, AQ, and AH molecules chemisorbed between Au contacts that predict currents, I, that are 2 orders of magnitude higher for AC than for AH at 0 < | Vj < 0.4 V. The calculations predict a higher value of I for AQthan for AH; however, the magnitude is highly dependent on the position of the Fermi energy, which cannot be calculated precisely. In this sense, the theoretical predictions and experimental conclusions agree that linearly conjugated AC is significantly more conductive than either cross-conjugated AQ or broken conjugate AH and that AQand AH cannot necessarily be easily differentiated from each other. These observations are ascribed to quantum interference effects. The agreement between the theoretical predictions on single molecules and the measurements on SAMs suggest that molecule—molecule interactions do not play a significant role in the transport properties of AC, AQ, and AH.
机译:本文比较了三种厚度近似相同,线性共轭(AC),交叉共轭(AQ)的乙炔基硫酚官能化蒽衍生物的自组装单层(SAM)的电流密度(J)与施加的偏压(V) ,以及使用共晶Ga-In(EGaln)的共轭共轭(AH)来支撑Ga_2O_3的天然皮肤(约1 nm厚),作为无损的共形顶部接触。这种皮肤具有非牛顿流变特性,可将EGaln与其他顶部接触区分开来。但是,它也可能限制了AC的最大值/观察到的值。 J tor AH和AQ的测量值没有显着差异(在V = 0.4 V时,J≈10〜(-1)A / cm〜2;但是对于AC,J为1(使用对数平均值)或2 (使用高斯拟合),数量级比AH和AQ高几个数量级,这些值与gDFTB计算得出的关于预测接触电流I的Au触点之间化学吸附的单个AC,AQ和AH分子的gDFTB计算具有很好的一致性。通过计算可以预测,在0 <| Vj <0.4 V时,AC的电流要比AH高;而AQ的I值要比AH高;但是,幅度在很大程度上取决于费米能量的位置,无法精确计算。从这个意义上讲,理论预测和实验结论都认为,线性共轭交流电比交叉共轭AQ或断裂的共轭AH导电性要好得多,而且AQ和AH不一定易于彼此区分开,这些观察结果归因于量子干扰效应。协议 对单个分子的理论预测与对SAM的测量之间的关系表明,分子与分子之间的相互作用在AC,AQ和AH的传输性质中不发挥重要作用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of the American Chemical Society》 |2011年第24期|p.9556-9563|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Stratingh Institute for Chemistry and Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AGGroningen, The Netherlands;

    Stratingh Institute for Chemistry and Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AGGroningen, The Netherlands;

    Stratingh Institute for Chemistry and Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AGGroningen, The Netherlands;

    Nano-Science Center and Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5,2100 Copenhagen 0, Denmark;

    Stratingh Institute for Chemistry and Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AGGroningen, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:14:18

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号