首页> 外文期刊>Journal of testing and evaluation >Evaluation of Innovative Cold Mix Recycled Asphalt Concrete as Backfill Material in Pipeline Maintenance
【24h】

Evaluation of Innovative Cold Mix Recycled Asphalt Concrete as Backfill Material in Pipeline Maintenance

机译:创新冷混合再生沥青混凝土作为管道维护中的回填材料的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cold mix recycled asphalt (CMRA) concrete was evaluated to be an innovative repair material to improve the pavement quality and environmental impact on pipeline maintenance in this study. The study presented and specifically examined the use of CMRA with 2.5 % foam asphalt content as a replacement for the currently used controlled low-strength material (CLSM) as pipeline backfill material. CMRA's material properties, performance, carbon dioxide emissions, cost, and construction time were analyzed in this study to confirm the advantages and limitations of CMRA. The results concluded that CMRA performed better than CLSM for all the items analyzed. Specifically, according to the performance analysis, CMRA exhibited a better Marshall stability index, California bearing ratio, indirect tensile strength, tensile strength ratio, anti-rutting ability, and penetration than the standards specified. Furthermore, the average carbon emissions of CMRA were 36 % less than CLSM, could save at least 2 h of construction time per cubic meter of construction, and immediately opened traffic. However, CRMA's construction cost in this study was similar to CLSM and was only lower (up to 2.3 %) by considering a similar price of cement, asphalt, and additives. Based on the aforementioned results, this study concluded that the findings may be of particular interest for Taiwanese pipeline maintenance projects as a backfill material and is worthy of further research.
机译:冷冻混合再生沥青(CMRA)混凝土被评估为一种创新的修复材料,以提高本研究中的路面质量和对管道维护的环境影响。该研究表明并具体地检查了CMRA的使用,用2.5%的泡沫沥青含量作为当前使用的受控低强度材料(CLSM)作为管道回填材料的替代品。在本研究中分析了CMRA的材料性质,性能,二氧化碳排放,成本和施工时间,以确认CMRA的优缺点。结果得出结论,CMRA比分析所有物品的CLSM表现优于CLSM。具体而言,根据性能分析,CMRA表现出更好的马歇尔稳定性指数,加州轴承比,间接拉伸强度,拉伸强度比,抗轨道能力和渗透而不是指定的标准。此外,CMRA的平均碳排放量比CLSM小36%,可以节省至少2小时的每个立方米的施工时间,并立即开放交通。然而,CRMA在本研究中的施工成本类似于CLSM,通过考虑类似的水泥,沥青和添加剂,才较低(高达2.3%)。基于上述结果,本研究得出结论,该研究结果可能对台湾管道维护项目作为回填材料特别感兴趣,值得进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号