首页> 外文期刊>Journal of testing and evaluation >Coal and Coke Volatile Matter Determination and Reconciliation of Differences in Yields Determined by Two ASTM Methods
【24h】

Coal and Coke Volatile Matter Determination and Reconciliation of Differences in Yields Determined by Two ASTM Methods

机译:煤和焦炭挥发性物质的测定和通过两种ASTM方法测定的收率差异的和解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For over 2 decades, fuel scientists have tried to reconcile the differences between the coal and coke volatile matter yields obtained using either a pre-heated (950℃) minimum volume vertical furnace (ASTM Method D3175) or a macro thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) system heated to a final temperature of 950℃ (macro TGA systems are those using 1 g or larger samples). This paper will describe experiments designed to help explain the differences in volatile matter yields. Parameters studied include sample heating rates, final temperatures, and pre-drying samples. Factors contributing to the differences between the two methods, such as observed differences between plastic and non-plastic coals and fixation of sulfur as sulfate in the pyrolysis residues, will be explained. Results from two interlaboratory studies, each involving over 10 laboratories, and other research projects were used to derive predictive equations to reconcile results from the two methods for determining volatile matter yields in coals.
机译:二十多年来,燃料科学家一直试图调和使用预热(950℃)最小体积立式炉(ASTM方法D3175)或大型热重分析仪(TGA)系统获得的煤和焦炭挥发物产量之间的差异。加热至最终温度950℃(大型TGA系统是使用1 g或更大样品的系统)。本文将描述旨在帮助解释挥发物产量差异的实验。研究的参数包括样品加热速率,最终温度和预干燥样品。将解释造成这两种方法之间差异的因素,例如观察到的可塑和非可塑煤之间的差异以及热解残渣中硫磺作为硫酸盐的固定。两项涉及10个以上实验室的实验室间研究的结果以及其他研究项目被用于推导预测方程,以调和确定煤炭中挥发性物质产量的两种方法的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号