首页> 外文期刊>Journal of testing and evaluation >Recommended Protocol for Round-Robin Studies in Additive Manufacturing
【24h】

Recommended Protocol for Round-Robin Studies in Additive Manufacturing

机译:增材制造中循环研究的推荐协议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

One way to improve confidence and encourage proliferation of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies and parts is by generating more high-quality data describing the performance of AM processes and parts. Many in the AM community see round-robin studies as a way to generate large data sets while distributing the cost among the participants, thereby reducing the cost to individual users. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has conducted and participated in several of these AM round-robin studies. Whereas the results of these studies are interesting and informative, many of the lessons learned in conducting these studies concern the logistics and methods of the study and unique issues presented by AM. Existing standards for conducting interlaboratory studies of measurement methods, along with NIST's experience, form the basis for recommended protocols for conducting AM round-robin studies. The role of round-robin studies in AM qualification, some of the limitations of round-robin studies, and the potential benefit of less formal collaborative experiments where multiple factors, AM machine being only one, are varied simultaneously are also discussed.
机译:提高信心并鼓励增材制造(AM)技术和零件激增的一种方法是生成描述AM工艺和零件性能的更高质量的数据。 AM社区中的许多人将循环研究视为生成大型数据集的一种方法,同时在参与者之间分配成本,从而降低了单个用户的成本。美国国家标准技术研究院(NIST)进行并参与了其中一些AM循环研究。这些研究的结果有趣而有益,而进行这些研究的许多经验教训则与研究的后勤方法和方法以及AM提出的独特问题有关。现有的用于进行实验室间测量方法研究的标准,以及NIST的经验,构成了进行AM循环研究的推荐方案的基础。还讨论了轮循研究在AM资格中的作用,轮循研究的一些局限性,以及较少形式的协作实验的潜在好处,在这种协作实验中,多种因素(AM机只是一个因素)同时变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号