首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness >Physiological changes following a 12 week gym based stair-climbing, elliptical trainer and treadmill running program in females
【24h】

Physiological changes following a 12 week gym based stair-climbing, elliptical trainer and treadmill running program in females

机译:在女性进行为期12周的健身房爬楼梯,椭圆机和跑步机跑步计划后的生理变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim. Despite the growing popularity in recent years of the elliptical trainer aerobic exercise modality the physiological changes induced following a training program using elliptical trainers remains unknown. The present study investigated the metabolic and cardiorespiratory improvements following a 12-week aerobic training program using elliptical trainer, treadmill or stair-climbing modalities. Methods. Twenty-two moderately active females (28.6±5.3 y, 1.65±0.05 m) were randomly assigned to treadmill running (n=7), elliptical trainer (n=8) or stair-climber (n=7) groups and trained 3 days.week~(-1) initially at 70-80% of maximum heart rate (HR_(max)) for 30 min, progressing to 80-90% HR_(max) for 40 min. Subjects performed incremental exercise to volitional exhaustion using an electronically loaded cycle ergometer before and upon completion of the program. In addition, subjects performed sub-maximal fixed load tests at 0,4,8 and 12 weeks, using ergometers specific to their exercise group. Results. No significant inter-group differences were recorded for pre-training VO_(2max) or V_(Emax). Significant (p < 0.05) post-training increases in cycling VO_(2max) and V_(Emax) were observed for treadmill (mean±SEM, 40.7±2.2 vs 43.4±2.6 ml.kg~(-1).min~(-1) and 82.9±5.1 vs 90.2±6.4 l.min~(-1)), elliptical trainer (36.9±2.5 vs 39.6±2.4 ml.kg~(-1).min~(-1) and 86.8±2.3 vs 92.5±4.1 l.min~(-1)) and stair-climber (37.4±2.9 vs 39.2±3.1 ml.kg~(-1).min~(-1) and 95.9±5.8 vs 97.4?5.8 l.min~(-1)) modalities, however, the increases were not significantly different between groups. For all groups, sub-maximal HR significantly decreased from week 0 to 4, and from week 4 to 8. Conclusion. In moderately active females similar physiological improvements were observed using stair-climber, elliptical trainer and treadmill running when training volume and intensity were equivalent.
机译:目标。尽管近年来椭圆训练器有氧运动方式越来越受欢迎,但是在使用椭圆训练器的训练程序之后引起的生理变化仍然未知。本研究调查了使用椭圆训练机,跑步机或爬楼梯方式的为期12周的有氧训练计划后的代谢和心肺功能改善。方法。 22名中等活跃女性(28.6±5.3 y,1.65±0.05 m)被随机分配到跑步机(n = 7),椭圆机(n = 8)或爬楼梯(n = 7)组并接受了3天的训练周(-1)开始时以最大心率(HR_(max))的70-80%进行30分钟,然后逐渐上升至80-90%HR_(max)进行40分钟。在程序完成之前和之后,受试者使用电子负载的自行车测力计进行增量锻炼,以达到自愿性疲劳。此外,受试者使用特定于他们运动组的测力计在0、4、8和12周进行了次最大固定负荷测试。结果。对于训练前的VO_(2max)或V_(Emax),没有记录到明显的组间差异。跑步机的训练后VO_(2max)和V_(Emax)的训练后显着(p <0.05)增加(平均值±SEM,40.7±2.2对43.4±2.6 ml.kg〜(-1).min〜(- 1)和82.9±5.1 vs 90.2±6.4 l.min〜(-1)),椭圆训练器(36.9±2.5 vs 39.6±2.4 ml.kg〜(-1).min〜(-1)和86.8±2.3 vs 92.5±4.1 l.min〜(-1))和爬楼梯(37.4±2.9 vs. 39.2±3.1 ml.kg〜(-1).min〜(-1)和95.9±5.8 vs 97.4±5.8 l。 min〜(-1))模式,但是,两组之间的增加没有显着差异。对于所有组,低于最大的HR从第0周到第4周以及从第4周到第8周均显着降低。在中等运动的女性中,当训练量和强度相等时,使用爬楼梯,椭圆机和跑步机观察到相似的生理改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号