首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Services Marketing >A re-examination of service standardization versus customization from the consumer's perspective
【24h】

A re-examination of service standardization versus customization from the consumer's perspective

机译:从消费者的角度重新审视服务标准化与定制化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the pros and cons of service standardization (vs customization) from the consumer's perspective, the key factors influencing consumers' preference for standardized (vs customized) services and the outcomes of service standardization (vs customization). Design/methodology/approach - The authors conducted a qualitative study and two behavioral experiments to test the hypotheses. Findings - The authors find that the advantages of service customization include greater perceived control and higher consumer satisfaction. The drawbacks of service customization include greater perceived risk. These findings also suggest that consumers' preference for standardized (vs customized) service depends on their consumption goal. Specifically, consumers with a hedonic goal tend to prefer customized services, while those with a utilitarian goal tend to prefer standardized services. These effects are moderated by their need for uniqueness. Research limitations/implications - The qualitative and experimental studies in this research reveal the antecedents (utilitarian vs hedonic goal) on consumer preference for service standardization versus customization, as well as the consequences in terms of perceived risk, consumer satisfaction and perceived control. The experimental studies were conducted with Chinese and American consumers, respectively, which lend credence to the robustness of the findings. Practical implications - Results of the present research provide new insights into service standardization versus customization and have significant practical implications. In particular, service organizations should consider designing the appropriate service mode based on consumers' characteristics, particularly their consumption goals and their need for uniqueness. If the customers focus on efficiency and functionality, the organization should try to provide standardized services. In contrast, for customers who are seeking fun and a novel experience, the service firm should try to tailor to their hedonic needs. Originality/value - While previous research identifies "heterogeneity" as a key characteristic of services in general, the present findings qualify this received wisdom. In particular, the authors show that consumers' preference for service standardization versus customization is a function of their consumption goal and need for uniqueness. Thus, the present findings refine the current understanding of service heterogeneity, which makes a significant contribution to the services marketing literature.
机译:目的-本文的目的是从消费者的角度研究服务标准化(相对于定制)的利弊,影响消费者偏爱标准化(相对于定制)服务的关键因素以及服务标准化(相对于定制)的结果。设计/方法/方法-作者进行了定性研究和两个行为实验以检验假设。发现-作者发现服务定制的优点包括更好的感知控制和更高的消费者满意度。服务定制的缺点包括更大的感知风险。这些发现还表明,消费者对标准化(相对于定制)服务的偏好取决于他们的消费目标。具体而言,具有享乐主义目标的消费者倾向于偏爱定制服务,而具有功利主义目标的消费者倾向于偏爱标准化服务。这些效果因其对唯一性的需求而有所缓解。研究的局限性/意义-该研究的定性和实验研究揭示了消费者对服务标准化与定制化的偏好(功利主义与享乐主义的目标),以及在感知风险,消费者满意度和感知控制方面的后果。实验研究分别在中国和美国的消费者中进行,这使调查结果的可靠性得到了证实。实际意义-本研究的结果提供了关于服务标准化与定制的新见解,并且具有重大的实际意义。服务组织尤其应考虑根据消费者的特征,特别是其消费目标和对独特性的需求,设计适当的服务模式。如果客户关注效率和功能,则组织应尝试提供标准化服务。相反,对于寻求乐趣和新颖体验的客户,服务公司应尝试满足其享乐需求。独创性/价值-尽管先前的研究将“异质性”确定为一般服务的关键特征,但目前的发现证明了这种公认的智慧。尤其是,作者表明,消费者偏向于服务标准化而不是定制,这取决于他们的消费目标和对独特性的需求。因此,本发现完善了对服务异构性的当前理解,这对服务营销文献做出了重大贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号