...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Portfolio Management >Greenspan vs. the Gold Standard
【24h】

Greenspan vs. the Gold Standard

机译:格林斯潘与黄金标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Alan Greenspan recently asked the tantalizing question, "How did we go so wrong?" He answered by asserting that " [there is] little evidence of a learning curve. Asset price bubbles build and burst today as they have since the early 18th century, when modern competitive markets evolved." If anybody should be aware of the absent learning curve, Greenspan should. He has the distinction of having presided over two bubbles during his stint as the chairman of the Federal Reserve-high-tech and home prices-which also partially overlapped. Paul Volcker, Greenspan's predecessor as Fed chairman, made an interesting and related point at about the same time as Greenspan. He referred to "[t]he mutual trust among respected market participants upon which any strong and efficient financial system must rest." This feature of "strong and efficient" markets never occurred to me, and I do not recall ever seeing any comment of this nature in the literature on the Efficient Market Hypothesis that has come my way. Discussions of rationality, the quality of information, the dissemination of information, and the ability to analyze information are endless, but both adherents and opponents have failed to emphasize the importance of mutual trust in the functioning of efficient markets.
机译:艾伦·格林斯潘(Alan Greenspan)最近问了一个诱人的问题:“我们怎么走错了?”他通过断言说:“ [几乎没有学习曲线的证据。资产价格泡沫像从18世纪初期现代竞争性市场发展以来的今天一样,不断形成和破裂。”如果有人应该意识到学习曲线的缺失,格林斯潘应该。他的独特之处在于,在担任美联储主席期间曾主持过两次泡沫,即高科技和房屋价格,这部分重叠。格林斯潘的前任保罗·沃尔克(Paul Volcker)是美联储主席,他与格林斯潘几乎同时提出了一个有趣且相关的观点。他提到“受尊敬的市场参与者之间的相互信任,任何强大而有效的金融体系都必须依靠这一信任。”我从来没有想到过“强而有力”的市场特征,而且我不记得曾经有过关于有效市场假说的文献发表过这种评论。关于合理性,信息质量,信息传播和分析信息的能力的讨论是无止境的,但是拥护者和反对者都没有强调相互信任对有效市场运作的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号