首页> 外文期刊>Journal of planning education and research >Security versus Status? A First Look at the Census's Gated Community Data
【24h】

Security versus Status? A First Look at the Census's Gated Community Data

机译:安全与状态?人口普查的门控社区数据初探

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For most people, the term gated communities conjures up images of exclusive developments with fancy homes and equally fancy lifestyles. Much of the popular and academic literature on gated communities promotes this view. Yet the common perception of gated communities as privileged enclaves turns out to be only partly correct based on our analysis of the first ever census survey of these places. There are gated communities composed of mostly White homeowners with high incomes that have a secure main entry-the kind of classic gated community in the public mind. But there are also gated communities that are inhabited by minority renters with moderate incomes. We expected that this dichotomy reflects a divide between gated communities, one based on status versus one motivated by concern for security. Using the 2001 American Housing Survey (AHS), we attempted to explain the differences between gated homeowners, nongated homeowners, gated renters, and nongated renter households.
机译:对于大多数人而言,“封闭式社区”一词会让人联想到带有高档住宅和同样高档生活方式的独家开发图像。关于封闭社区的许多流行和学术文献都提倡这种观点。然而,根据我们对有史以来第一次对这些地方的人口普查分析,对封闭式社区作为特权飞地的普遍看法只是部分正确。有一些封闭的社区,这些社区主要由高收入的白人房主组成,这些社区拥有安全的主要入口,这是公众心目中的经典封闭式社区。但是,也有一些收入中等的少数族裔租户居住的封闭式社区。我们希望这种二分法反映出封闭式社区之间的鸿沟,一个是基于地位,另一个是出于对安全的关注。使用2001年美国房屋调查(AHS),我们试图解释封闭式房主,非封闭式房主,封闭式房客和非封闭式房主家庭之间的区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号