首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics >Simulating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic fuzzy-parameterized models: a comparison of numerical methods
【24h】

Simulating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic fuzzy-parameterized models: a comparison of numerical methods

机译:模拟药代动力学和药效学模糊参数化模型:数值方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Statistical techniques have been traditionally used to deal with parametric variation in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models, but these require substantial data for estimates of probability distributions. In the presence of limited, inaccurate or imprecise information, simulation with fuzzy numbers represents an alternative tool to handle parametric uncertainty. Existing methods for implementing fuzzy arithmetic may, however, have significant shortcomings in overestimating (e.g., conventional fuzzy arithmetic) and underestimating (e.g., vertex method) the output uncertainty. The purpose of the present study is to apply and compare the applicability of conventional fuzzy arithmetic, vertex method and two recently proposed numerical schemes, namely transformation and optimization methods, for uncertainty modeling in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic fuzzy-parameterized systems. A series of test problems were examined, including empirical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models, a function non-monotonic in its parameters, and a whole body physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. Our results verified that conventional fuzzy arithmetic can lead to overestimation of response uncertainty and should be avoided. For the monotonic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models, the vertex method accurately predicted fuzzy-valued output while incurring the least computational cost. It turned out that the choice of a suitable method for fuzzy simulation of the non-monotonic function depended on the required accuracy of the results: the vertex method was capable of eliciting an initial approximate solution with few function evaluations; for more accurate results, the transformation method was the most superior approach in terms of accuracy per unit CPU time.
机译:传统上已经使用统计技术来处理药代动力学和药效学模型中的参数变化,但是这些技术需要大量数据来估计概率分布。在信息有限,不准确或不精确的情况下,使用模糊数字进行仿真是处理参数不确定性的另一种工具。但是,用于实现模糊算术的现有方法在高估(例如常规模糊算术)和低估(例如顶点方法)输出不确定性方面可能具有明显的缺点。本研究的目的是在药代动力学和药效学模糊参数化系统的不确定性建模中,应用和比较常规模糊算术,顶点法和两个最近提出的数值方案(即变换和优化方法)的适用性。检查了一系列测试问题,包括经验药代动力学和药效学模型,参数非单调函数以及基于全身生理学的药代动力学模型。我们的结果证明,传统的模糊算法会导致对响应不确定性的高估,应避免使用。对于单调的药代动力学和药效学模型,顶点法可以准确地预测模糊值的输出,而所需的计算成本却最少。事实证明,对非单调函数进行模糊仿真的合适方法的选择取决于结果的要求精度:顶点方法能够以很少的函数评估得出初始近似解;为了获得更准确的结果,就单位CPU时间的准确性而言,转换方法是最优越的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号