...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pension economics and finance >Discretion in the accounting for defined benefit obligations - an empirical analysis of German IFRS statements
【24h】

Discretion in the accounting for defined benefit obligations - an empirical analysis of German IFRS statements

机译:设定受益义务的会计自由裁量权-对德国IFRS声明的实证分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Following the research approach of Hann et al. (2007), this study investigates how discretion in the determination of the defined benefit obligation (DBO) is perceived by investors using a sample of listed German companies in the period of 2005-2011. For this, actuarial assumptions - discount interest rates, compensation growth rate and projected future pension increases - are replaced by their respective industry medians to obtain that component of the DBO, which can be attributed to discretion. We find that the discretionary component is not value relevant in overall terms, which is in contrast to prior research. We provide an explanation in the country-specific characteristics of Germany. Furthermore, we find weak evidence that the discretionary component is incorporated in investor's equity valuations when pension plans are distinctly underfunded.
机译:按照Hann等人的研究方法。 (2007年),本研究调查了投资者如何使用2005-2011年期间德国上市公司的样本来确定确定的给付义务(DBO)。为此,精算假设(折现利率,薪酬增长率和预计的未来养老金增长)将被其各自的行业中位数所取代,以获取DBO的这一组成部分,这可以归因于谨慎性。我们发现,酌处权部分在整体上与价值不相关,这与先前的研究相反。我们提供了德国特定国家/地区特征的说明。此外,我们发现微弱的证据表明,在养老金计划明显资金不足的情况下,可自由支配的因素已纳入投资者的股票估值中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号