首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Systematic Review: The Evidence That Publishing Patient Care Performance Data Improves Quality of Care
【24h】

Systematic Review: The Evidence That Publishing Patient Care Performance Data Improves Quality of Care

机译:系统评价:发布患者护理绩效数据可改善护理质量的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Previous reviews have shown inconsistent effects of publicly reported performance data on quality of care, but many new studies have become available in the 7 years since the last systematic review. nnPurpose: To synthesize the evidence for using publicly reported performance data to improve quality. nnData Sources: Web of Science, MEDLINE, EconLit, and Wilson Business Periodicals (1999–2006) and independent review of articles (1986–1999) identified in a previous systematic review. Only sources published in English were included. nnStudy Selection: Peer-reviewed articles assessing the effects of public release of performance data on selection of providers, quality improvement activity, clinical outcomes (effectiveness, patient safety, and patient-centeredness), and unintended consequences. nnData Extraction: Data on study participants, reporting system or level, study design, selection of providers, quality improvement activity, outcomes, and unintended consequences were extracted. nnData Synthesis: Forty-five articles published since 1986 (27 of which were published since 1999) evaluated the impact of public reporting on quality. Many focus on a select few reporting systems. Synthesis of data from 8 health plan–level studies suggests modest association between public reporting and plan selection. Synthesis of 11 studies, all hospital-level, suggests stimulation of quality improvement activity. Review of 9 hospital-level and 7 individual provider–level studies shows inconsistent association between public reporting and selection of hospitals and individual providers. Synthesis of 11 studies, primarily hospital-level, indicates inconsistent association between public reporting and improved effectiveness. Evidence on the impact of public reporting on patient safety and patient-centeredness is scant. nnLimitations: Heterogeneity made comparisons across studies challenging. Only peer-reviewed, English-language articles were included. nnConclusion: Evidence is scant, particularly about individual providers and practices. Rigorous evaluation of many major public reporting systems is lacking. Evidence suggests that publicly releasing performance data stimulates quality improvement activity at the hospital level. The effect of public reporting on effectiveness, safety, and patient-centeredness remains uncertain.
机译:背景:先前的审查显示公开报告的绩效数据对护理质量的影响不一致,但是自上次系统审查以来的7年中,已有许多新研究可用。目的:综合使用公开报告的绩效数据来改善质量的证据。 nn数据来源:Web of Science,MEDLINE,EconLit和Wilson Business Periodicals(1999-2006年)以及在先前的系统综述中确定的文章独立评论(1986-1999年)。仅包括以英文出版的资源。 nn研究选择:经过同行评审的文章评估了公开发布绩效数据对选择提供者,质量改进活动,临床结果(有效性,患者安全性和以患者为中心)以及意外后果的影响。 nn数据提取:提取有关研究参与者,报告系统或级别,研究设计,提供者的选择,质量改进活动,结果和意外后果的数据。 nn数据综合:自1986年以来发表了45篇文章(其中27篇自1999年以来发表)评估了公共报告对质量的影响。许多人专注于少数几个报告系统。来自8个健康计划水平研究的数据综合表明,公共报告与计划选择之间存在适度的关联。所有医院级别的11项研究的综合表明刺激了质量改善活动。对9个医院级别和7个个人提供者级别的研究进行的审查显示,公共报告与医院和个人提供者的选择之间存在不一致的关联。对11项研究(主要是医院一级的研究)的综合表明,公共报告与有效性提高之间存在不一致的关联。关于公共报告对患者安全和以患者为中心的影响的证据很少。 nnLimitations:异质性使研究之间的比较具有挑战性。仅包括经过同行评审的英语文章。 nn结论:证据很少,尤其是有关个体提供者和做法的证据。缺乏对许多主要公共报告系统的严格评估。有证据表明,公开发布绩效数据会刺激医院一级的质量改进活动。公开报告对有效性,安全性和以患者为中心的影响仍然不确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号