...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oleo Science >In Vitro Assessment of the Cytotoxicity of Anti-allergic Eye Drops Using 5 Cultured Corneal and Conjunctival Cell Lines
【24h】

In Vitro Assessment of the Cytotoxicity of Anti-allergic Eye Drops Using 5 Cultured Corneal and Conjunctival Cell Lines

机译:使用5种培养的角膜和结膜细胞系体外评估抗过敏滴眼液的细胞毒性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of anti-allergic eye drops for human corneal endothelial cells (HCEC) and commercially available ocular surface cells. A primary HCEC culture was derived from human eye bank specimens. SIRC (rabbit corneal epithelium), BCE C/D-lb (bovine corneal epithelial cells), RC-1 (rabbit corneal epithelium), and Chang (human conjunctival cells) were obtained commercially. The WST-1 assay was used to measure HCEC viability, and the viability of other cells was measured using the MTT assay. Cells were treated with 7 commercially available anti-allergic eye drops for 48 h and cell viability was measured and calculated as a percentage of control. The degree of toxicity for each eye-drop solution was based on the cell viability score (CVS). HCECs treated with a 1000-fold dilution of the eye-drop solution had a viability score of 67% for Rizaben and >80% for the other solutions with Zepelin being the least toxic. Cell viability in response to eye-drop solutions preserved with benzalkonium chloride (BAK) was dependent on the concentration of the drug solution and exposure time. Treatment of ocular surface cells with a 20-fold dilution of the eye-drop solution resulted in the following order of cell viability as determined by their CVS: Zepelin > Ketas = Zaditen > Tramelas PF = Patanol > Rizaben > Livostin. This order was similar to that observed for HCECs, and cell viability was found to be concentration-dependent. Based on the penetration of the drug into eye tissues, HCECs are only likely to be pharmaceutically damaging in rare cases. Epithelial cell viability depends primarily on the concentration of BAK rather than on the action of the active component in the eye-drop solution. CVS values were useful for comparison of toxicity.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估抗过敏滴眼液对人角膜内皮细胞(HCEC)和市售眼表细胞的细胞毒性。 HCEC的主要培养物来自人眼库标本。 SIRC(兔角膜上皮),BCE C / D-1b(牛角膜上皮细胞),RC-1(兔角膜上皮细胞)和Chang(人结膜细胞)已商业获得。 WST-1测定法用于测量HCEC的活力,而其他细胞的活力则使用MTT测定法进行测量。用7种市售抗过敏滴眼液处理细胞48小时,然后测量细胞活力并将其计算为对照的百分比。每种滴眼剂溶液的毒性程度基于细胞生存力得分(CVS)。用1000倍稀释的滴眼剂溶液处理的HCEC对Rizaben的生存力得分为67%,对其他溶液的生存力得分为> 80%,而Zepelin的毒性最低。响应于用苯扎氯铵(BAK)保存的滴眼液的细胞活力取决于药物溶液的浓度和暴露时间。用20倍稀释的滴眼剂溶液处理眼表层细胞,其细胞活力由以下顺序决定:Zepelin> Ketas = Zaditen> Tramelas PF = Patanol> Rizaben> Livostin。该顺序与对HCEC观察到的顺序相似,并且发现细胞活力是浓度依赖性的。基于药物渗透到眼组织中,HCEC仅在极少数情况下可能会对药物造成损害。上皮细胞的生存能力主要取决于BAK的浓度,而不取决于滴眼液中活性成分的作用。 CVS值可用于毒性比较。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Oleo Science》 |2011年第3期|p.139-144|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Ophthalmology, Saitama National Hospital (2-1 Suwa, Wako, Saitama 351-0102, JAPAN),;

    Life Particle Interaction Engineering Creation, New Industry Creation Hatchery Center, Tohoku University (6-6-10 Aramaki-Aoba, Aoba, Sendai,Miyagi 980-8579, JAPAN),;

    Department of Ophthalmology, Showa University School of Medicine (1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa, Tokyo 142-8666, JAPAN);

    Department of Ophthalmology, Showa University School of Medicine (1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa, Tokyo 142-8666, JAPAN);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    benzalkonium chloride; toxicity; eye drop; preservative; eye; cell viability score;

    机译:苯扎氯铵;毒性;眼药水;防腐剂;眼睛;细胞生存力分数;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号