...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation >The Readiness for Return-To-Work (RRTW) scale: Development and Validation of a Self-report Staging Scale in Lost-time Claimants with Musculoskeletal Disorders
【24h】

The Readiness for Return-To-Work (RRTW) scale: Development and Validation of a Self-report Staging Scale in Lost-time Claimants with Musculoskeletal Disorders

机译:复工准备量表(RRTW):患有肌肉骨骼疾病的失时索赔者的自我报告分期量表的制定和验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction We report on the development and validation of a 22-item scale assessing stage of readiness for return-to-work, the Readiness for Return-to-Work (RRTW) scale. Methods Lost-time claimants (n = 632) completed a telephone survey one month after a work-related musculoskeletal injury. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of readiness items were conducted with two separate samples, and concurrent validity was examined. Results For workers not working, 60% of the variance was explained by four factors—(1) Precontemplation, (2) Contemplation (3) Prepared for Action—Self-evaluative and (4) Prepared for Action—Behavioral. For those working, 58% of the variance was explained by two factors—(1) Uncertain Maintenance and (2) Proactive Maintenance. Confirmatory factor analyses had satisfactory fit indices to confirm the initial model. Concurrent validity of the scale was supported: Relationships of readiness with depressive symptoms, fear-avoidance, pain, and general health, were generally in the hypothesized direction. Conclusions Psychometric properties of the newly developed instrument suggest that the application of the Readiness for Change model to return-to-work is relevant to work disability research. The instrument may facilitate the offer of stage-specific services tailored to injured workers’ needs, and be used for evaluation of return-to-work interventions.
机译:简介我们报告了22个项目的量表的开发和验证,该量表评估了重返工作的准备阶段,即重返工作的准备(RRTW)规模。方法在与工作有关的肌肉骨骼损伤后一个月,损失时间的索赔人(n = 632)完成了一次电话调查。对准备项目的探索性和确认性因素分析使用两个单独的样本进行,并检验了并发有效性。结果对于不工作的工人,有60%的差异由四个因素解释:(1)预先沉思,(2)沉思(3)为行动做准备-自我评估,以及(4)为行动做准备-行为。对于那些工作的人,58%的差异由两个因素解释:(1)不确定的维护和(2)主动维护。验证性因素分析具有令人满意的拟合指数以确认初始模型。支持该量表的并发有效性:准备状态与抑郁症状,避免恐惧,疼痛和总体健康的关系通常处于假设的方向。结论新开发的仪器的心理测量特性表明,“准备就绪”模型在重返工作中的应用与工作障碍研究有关。该工具可以促进针对受伤工人的需求提供针对特定阶段的服务,并可以用于评估重返工作岗位的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号