...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Monetary Economics >Can trade costs explain why exchange rate volatility does not feed into consumer prices?
【24h】

Can trade costs explain why exchange rate volatility does not feed into consumer prices?

机译:贸易成本能解释为什么汇率波动不影响消费者价格吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

If countries specialize in imperfectly substitutable goods, trade costs increase the share of expenditure devoted to domestic output, reducing the exposure of consumer price inflation to exchange rate changes. I present a multi-country flexible-price model where expenditure shares are inversely related to trade costs through a gravity equation. In this setting, consumer price inflation can be approximated as an expenditure-share-weighted average of the contributions to inflation from all countries. I use data from 24 OECD countries, 1970-2003, to estimate a structural gravity model. I combine the fitted expenditure shares from the estimation with actual data on exchange rates to construct predictions of inflation. The behavior of these predictions indicates that trade costs can explain both qualitatively and quantitatively the failure of exchange rate volatility to feed into inflation.
机译:如果国家专门研究不完全可替代的商品,贸易成本会增加用于国内生产的支出份额,从而降低消费者价格通胀对汇率变化的影响。我提出了一个多国灵活价格模型,其中支出份额通过引力方程与贸易成本成反比。在这种情况下,消费者价格通胀可以近似为所有国家对通胀贡献的支出份额加权平均值。我使用了1970-2003年来自OECD 24个国家的数据来估计结构重力模型。我将估算中的拟合支出份额与汇率的实际数据结合起来,以构建通货膨胀的预测。这些预测的行为表明,贸易成本可以定性和定量地解释汇率波动导致通货膨胀的失败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号