首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Systems >Research-Based-Decision-Making in Canadian Health Organizations: A Behavioural Approach
【24h】

Research-Based-Decision-Making in Canadian Health Organizations: A Behavioural Approach

机译:加拿大卫生组织中基于研究的决策制定:一种行为方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Decision making in Health sector is affected by a several elements such as economic constraints, political agendas, epidemiologic events, managers’ values and environment … These competing elements create a complex environment for decision making. Research-Based-Decision-Making (RBDM) offers an opportunity to reduce the generated uncertainty and to ensure efficacy and efficiency in health administrations. We assume that RBDM is dependant on decision makers’ behaviour and the identification of the determinants of this behaviour can help to enhance research results utilization in health sector decision making. This paper explores the determinants of RBDM as a personal behaviour among managers and professionals in health administrations in Canada. From the behavioural theories and the existing literature, we build a model measuring “RBDM” as an index based on five items. These items refer to the steps accomplished by a decision maker while developing a decision which is based on evidence. The determinants of RBDM behaviour are identified using data collected from 942 health care decision makers in Canadian health organizations. Linear regression is used to model the behaviour RBDM. Determinants of this behaviour are derived from Triandis Theory and Bandura's construct “self-efficacy.” The results suggest that to improve research use among managers in Canadian governmental health organizations, strategies should focus on enhancing exposition to evidence through facilitating communication networks, partnerships and links between researchers and decision makers, with the key long-term objective of developing a culture that supports and values the contribution that research can make to decision making in governmental health organizations. Nevertheless, depending on the organizational level, determinants of RBDM are different. This difference has to be taken into account if RBDM adoption is desired. Decision makers in Canadian health organizations (CHO) can help to build networks, develop partnerships between professionals locally, regionally and nationally, and also act as change agents in the dissemination and adoption of knowledge and innovations in health services. However, the research focused on knowledge use as a support to decision-making, further research is needed to identify and evaluate effective incentives and strategies to implement so as to enhance RBDM adoption among health decision makers and more theoretical development are to complete in this perspective.
机译:卫生部门的决策受到多种因素的影响,例如经济约束,政治议程,流行病学事件,管理者的价值观和环境……这些相互竞争的因素为决策创造了复杂的环境。基于研究的决策(RBDM)提供了一个机会,可以减少所产生的不确定性并确保卫生管理的有效性和效率。我们假设RBDM取决于决策者的行为,而确定这种行为的决定因素可以帮助提高研究结果在卫生部门决策中的利用率。本文探讨了RBDM作为加拿大卫生行政管理人员和专业人员之间的个人行为的决定因素。根据行为理论和现有文献,我们基于五个项目建立了一个衡量“ RBDM”作为指标的模型。这些项目指的是决策者在制定基于证据的决策时完成的步骤。 RBDM行为的决定因素是使用从加拿大卫生组织的942名卫生保健决策者收集的数据确定的。线性回归用于对行为RBDM建模。这种行为的决定因素来自特里安迪斯理论和班杜拉的建构“自我效能感”。结果表明,为了改善加拿大政府卫生组织管理人员之间的研究利用,战略应着重于通过促进研究人员与决策者之间的交流网络,伙伴关系和联系来加强对证据的公开,其长期目标是发展一种能够支持并重视研究对政府卫生组织的决策做出的贡献。但是,取决于组织级别,RBDM的决定因素是不同的。如果需要采用RBDM,则必须考虑到这种差异。加拿大卫生组织(CHO)的决策者可以帮助建立网络,在本地,区域和国家级的专业人员之间建立伙伴关系,还可以充当卫生服务知识和创新的传播和采用的变革推动者。但是,该研究侧重于知识的使用,以支持决策,需要进一步研究以识别和评估有效的激励措施和实施策略,以增强健康决策者对RBDM的采用,并在此角度上完成更多的理论发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号