...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management >Measuring State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty: Theoretical Construct Development and Empirical Validation
【24h】

Measuring State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty: Theoretical Construct Development and Empirical Validation

机译:测量状态,效果和响应不确定性:理论结构的发展和经验验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An important contribution to the literature on perceived environmental uncertainty (PEU) is Milliken's distinction between state uncertainty, effect uncertainty, and response uncertainty. However, despite its appealing logic in capturing the types of uncertainty managers may experience as they seek to understand and respond to changes in an organization's environment, there has been no full and rigorous psychometric development and testing of scales to measure the three constructs. Using a two-phase empirical study, this research seeks to develop and test such scales in terms of dimensionality, reliability, and validity (including nomological validity). The results suggest that managers do make a meaningful distinction between different types of uncertainty, that it is worthwhile measuring all three constructs (as they have differential impacts on outcome variables), and that there are linkages between them. Managerial contributions and implications for future research are also discussed.
机译:关于感知环境不确定性(PEU)的文献的重要贡献是Milliken对状态不确定性,影响不确定性和响应不确定性的区分。但是,尽管在吸引管理人员寻求理解和应对组织环境变化的过程中可能遇到的不确定性时,采用了吸引人的逻辑,但是还没有全面而严格的心理测量方法开发和量表测试来测量这三种结构。本研究使用两阶段的经验研究,试图从维度,信度和效度(包括法理学的效度)方面开发和检验此类量表。结果表明,管理者的确在不同类型的不确定性之间做出了有意义的区分,值得测量所有三种构造(因为它们对结果变量具有不同的影响),并且它们之间存在联系。还讨论了管理贡献和对未来研究的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号