...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of management studies >Imbrication of Representations: Risk and Digital Technologies
【24h】

Imbrication of Representations: Risk and Digital Technologies

机译:代表权的禁令:风险与数字技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Though emerging from different venues and backgrounds, risk management and digital applications are both based on sophisticated techniques of representation. This paper tracks the multiple overlappings and convergence between these two streams of representations. Initially digital technologies play a background role, as a tool to execute the algorithms of risk calculus. Then, they are useful in managing surveys and data analysis for those areas where risk management needs to store data on, for example, accidents. With the extension of markets for trading risk, computers and networks (or Information and Communication Technologies, ICT) become the tools of choice to allow the efficient functioning of industries like insurance. In other industries, like banking, where 'the business' is a vast archipelago of applications running on systems and networks, it is apparent that these integrated systems are inherently exposed to risk. Hence, these humble tools become both the infrastructure of the risk industry, and also the source of new, often incalculable risks; they move from a clear-cut subordinate relationship (as tool) to that of imbrication. Risk representations become more calculable and formalized, but this is obtained at the price of an incalculability of the risks of the infrastructure itself. The analysis of the multiple patterns of imbrication of representations between risk and digital technologies is applied to a range of empirical domains: from software engineering and information systems (the subservient infrastructure); to operational risk in banking; and finally to the future scenario of the democratization of finance, whereby Global Risk Information Databases (GRIDs), become gigantic machines to represent, compute, and trade all sorts of individual and social risks. Overall, the paper seeks to characterize the multiple links between risk and digital technologies in organizations and draws in part on the phenomenology of representation and Heidegger's studies of Care and Concern and his later work on the essence of modern technology.
机译:尽管风险管理和数字应用程序来自不同的地点和背景,但它们都基于复杂的表示技术。本文跟踪了这两种表示流之间的多重重叠和收敛。最初,数字技术作为执行风险演算算法的工具发挥着后台作用。然后,它们对于风险管理需要存储例如事故数据的区域的管理调查和数据分析很有用。随着交易风险市场的扩展,计算机和网络(或信息和通信技术,ICT)成为使保险等行业有效运作的首选工具。在银行等其他行业中,“业务”是在系统和网络上运行的应用程序的巨大群岛,很明显,这些集成系统固有地面临风险。因此,这些不起眼的工具既成为风险行业的基础设施,又成为新的,往往无法估量的风险的来源。它们从明确的从属关系(作为工具)转变为约束。风险表示变得更加可计算和形式化,但这是以基础设施本身的风险无法估量为代价的。风险和数字技术之间多种形式的表达方式的分析被应用于一系列经验领域:软件工程和信息系统(从属基础设施);银行业务的操作风险;最后是金融民主化的未来场景,全球风险信息数据库(GRID)成为代表,计算和交易各种个人和社会风险的巨大机器。总体而言,本文旨在刻画组织中风险与数字技术之间的多重联系,并在一定程度上借鉴了代表性的现象学以及海德格尔对关怀与关注的研究以及他后来对现代技术本质的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号