...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management History >The value of original source readings in management education: The case of Frederick Winslow Taylor
【24h】

The value of original source readings in management education: The case of Frederick Winslow Taylor

机译:原始资料阅读在管理教育中的价值:以弗雷德里克·温斯洛·泰勒为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - Frederick Taylor, the "Father of Scientific Management" is recognized as a pioneer in the field of management. However, many unfair criticisms have been leveled at him starting with the infamous Congressional hearings of 1911. Many scholars of management history believe that such criticisms have resulted in negative portrayals of Frederick Taylor in both practitioner and academic circles, and even in some basic management textbooks. This is unfortunate because many of those criticisms result from either a failure to read and understand Taylor's original works or from misinterpretations of them. The purpose of this paper is to contend that students of management will develop a more accurate impression of Frederick Taylor if they read his words and not interpretations of them.rnDesign/methodology/approach - First, an introduction of Frederick Taylor and scientific management is presented. Then, a categorization of common criticisms of Taylor is offered. The results of a study conducted to measure undergraduate business students' impressions of Taylor from their exposure to him in an introductory management course are then presented. The students then give their impressions of statements taken from Taylor's original work and are tested on the differences between them.rnFindings - The results of the analyses suggest that students have a negative impression of Taylor from their textbooks, but their reaction to statements taken from the original works of Taylor are rated quite favorably.rnPractical implications - Future research could be conducted to determine whether the works of other seminal management theorists should be presented in their complete contexts and direct sources to provide students with a more accurate and complete portrayal of their ideas. Originality/value - This paper is unique in that it empirically tests whether negative attitudes towards Frederick Taylor and scientific management persist after students are exposed to original source works.
机译:目的-“科学管理之父”弗雷德里克·泰勒(Frederick Taylor)被公认为管理领域的先驱。但是,从1911年臭名昭著的国会听证会开始,就对他进行了许多不公正的批评。许多管理历史学者认为,这些批评导致弗雷德里克·泰勒在从业者和学术界,甚至在一些基本的管理教科书中都受到负面描述。 。这是不幸的,因为许多批评是由于未能阅读和理解泰勒的原创作品,或是由于对它们的误解。本文的目的是说,如果管理专业的学生阅读弗雷德里克·泰勒的话而不是对其进行解释,将会对弗雷德里克·泰勒产生更准确的印象。rn设计/方法论/方法-首先,介绍弗雷德里克·泰勒和科学管理。然后,对泰勒的常见批评进行了分类。然后介绍了一项测量结果,该测量结果用于测量商业管理本科生对泰勒的印象,从他们对泰勒的接触中获得的印象。然后,学生给出他们对泰勒原创作品的陈述的印象,并对其之间的差异进行测试。rn结果-分析结果表明,学生对课本中的泰勒印象有负面印象,但他们对来自泰勒作品的陈述的反应却是负面的。泰勒(Taylor)的原创作品获得了很高的评价。实践意义-可以进行未来的研究以确定是否应该在完整的语境中展示其他精益管理理论家的作品并直接提供资料,以使学生更准确,完整地描述他们的思想。原创性/价值-本文的独特之处在于,它可以从经验上检验在学生接触原始资料后,对弗雷德里克·泰勒(Frederick Taylor)和科学管理的否定态度是否仍然存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号