首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management History >The history of the modernisation construct Tracing the contribution of business and economic historians
【24h】

The history of the modernisation construct Tracing the contribution of business and economic historians

机译:现代化建设的历史追溯商业和经济史学家的贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to trace and/or historicise modernisation as a conceptual framework from the antecedents to present times. It also highlights the recent and past attention provided to modernisation by business and economic history scholars to recognise their contribution. Design/methodology/approach - This paper is a literature review which offers a sample of debate from foundational scholars regarding the concept of modernisation emanating from sociologists, historians and business scholars. To present an analysis of the recent activity from business scholars on modernisation from highly recognizable journals and draw conclusions about the conceptual framework regarding its future as a framing device, the authors used search functions in the Business Source Complete database and specific journal search engines. Findings - A keyword search of modernisation produced 45 published articles from 2000 to 2016 in business-related history and Financial Times top 50 journals. The foremost recognizable aspect of modernisation, as a construct presented here, demonstrates the concept that aims to illustrate a basic and/or universal pattern of the social processes that primarily affect development (e.g. cultural, economic, organisational, ecological, technological, etc.). Moreover, the authors demonstrate that economic and business scholars helped identify and explain different types of modernisation, reinforce or connect specific characteristics to modernisation, develop modernisation as an index capable of measurement and provide evidence of modernisation as a rhetorical strategy. Originality/value - Little to no previous studies on modernisation emphasised on the contribution of business and economic historians; instead, they focused on the contributions of sociologists and social historians. Business and management historians served as an important voice in the development of modernisation as a conceptual frame. They highlighted the opportunities that are available to position modernisation as a useful tool to predict the future of traditional and advanced organisations.
机译:目的-本文旨在追溯和/或历史化现代化,将其作为从前到今的概念框架。它还强调了商业和经济史学者最近和过去对现代化的关注,以表彰他们的贡献。设计/方法论/方法-本文是一篇文献综述,提供了一些基础学者关于社会学家,历史学家和商业学者提出的有关现代化概念的辩论样本。为了对知名度高的期刊上的商务学者最近进行的活动进行分析并得出关于将其作为框架设备的未来的概念框架的结论,作者使用了Business Source Complete数据库和特定期刊搜索引擎中的搜索功能。调查结果-现代化的关键字搜索从2000年至2016年,在与商业相关的历史和《金融时报》前50种期刊中发表了45篇已发表的文章。作为此处介绍的结构,现代化最重要的方面是演示该概念,该概念旨在说明主要影响发展(例如文化,经济,组织,生态,技术等)的社会过程的基本和/或普遍模式。 。此外,作者证明,经济和商业学者帮助识别和解释了不同类型的现代化,加强或将特定特征与现代化联系起来,将现代化发展为能够衡量的指标,并为现代化作为一种​​修辞策略提供了证据。原创性/价值-以前很少或几乎没有关于现代化的研究强调商业和经济历史学家的贡献;相反,他们专注于社会学家和社会历史学家的贡献。商业和管理历史学家在现代化发展的概念框架中扮演了重要角色。他们强调了将现代化定位为预测传统和高级组织的未来的有用工具的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号