首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Management Development >The importance level of ten teaching/learning techniques as rated by university business students and instructors
【24h】

The importance level of ten teaching/learning techniques as rated by university business students and instructors

机译:大学商科学生和讲师对十种教学技术的重要性等级的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Four active-like (A-like) and six passive-like (P-like) business teaching/learning techniques are described. It is proposed that students enrolled and faculty teaching in the international business (INTB), marketing (MKT), and management (MAN) business concentrations would rate the A-like techniques higher than students enrolled and faculty teaching in the management information systems (MIS), finance (FIN), and accounting (ACC) business concentrations. And that students enrolled and faculty teaching in the MIS, FIN, and ACC concentrations would rate the P-like techniques higher than the students and faculty in the INTB, MKT, and MAN concentrations. Using a survey questionnaire, upper undergraduate and MBA university business students and faculty were asked to indicate the importance level for each technique. Students' ratings do not support the proposition in nine techniques and the faculty ratings do not support it in eight. The conclusion is that the study at least provides a framework that can aid instructors in understanding that different students prefer and different situations require different instructional techniques.
机译:描述了四种主动式(A类)和六个被动式(P类)商务教学/学习技术。建议在国际商务(INTB),市场营销(MKT)和管理(MAN)业务集中的在校生和教员教学将对A类技术的评价要高于在管理信息系统(MIS)中在校生和教员教学的学生),财务(FIN)和会计(ACC)业务集中。而且,在MIS,FIN和ACC集中就读的学生和教职人员对类P技术的评价要比在INTB,MKT和MAN集中的学生和教职人员更高。使用调查问卷,要求高等本科生和MBA大学的商科学生和教职员工指出每种技术的重要性级别。学生的评分不支持九种技巧的命题,而教师的评分不支持八种技巧的命题。结论是,这项研究至少提供了一个框架,可以帮助教师理解不同的学生更喜欢并且不同的情况需要不同的教学技巧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号