首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Learning Sciences >A Transfer-in-Pieces Consideration of the Perception of Structure in the Transfer of Learning
【24h】

A Transfer-in-Pieces Consideration of the Perception of Structure in the Transfer of Learning

机译:在学习转移中对结构感知的部分转移考虑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many approaches to the transfer problem argue that transfer depends on the recognition of the same or similar abstract structure in 2 different situations. However, mainstream cognitive perspectives and contrasting Piagetian constructivist accounts differ in their conceptualizations of structure. These differences, not clearly articulated in the literature, have significant implications for accounts of transfer. Using interview data involving undergraduates learning elementary principles of probability and statistics, and Wagner's (2006) transfer-in-pieces perspective, I extend existing constructivist accounts of transfer in at least 2 ways. First, I show how the notion of a concept projection (diSessa & Wagner, 2005; Wagner, 200663. Wagner, J. F. 2006. Transfer in pieces. Cognition and Instruction, 24: 1-71. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®]View all references) reveals fine-grained mechanisms of transfer that demonstrate how people structure situations and that elaborate on the Piagetian processes of assimilation and accommodation. Second, I examine how what experts consider a single mathematical concept or principle may come to be recognized through a variety of assimilatory cognitive resources whose usefulness is influenced by contextual factors. That is, an individual might structure 2 contextually dissimilar situations differently while perceiving the same mathematical principle at work in both. Similarly, 2 or more individuals may agree on the relevance of a particular mathematical concept in a situation, even though each structures the situation differently.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.505138
机译:解决转移问题的许多方法都认为转移取决于在两种不同情况下对相同或相似抽象结构的识别。但是,主流的认知观点和对比的皮亚杰主义建构主义观点在结构概念上有所不同。这些差异在文献中未明确阐明,对转移账户具有重大影响。使用涉及大学生学习概率和统计学基本原理的访谈数据,以及Wagner(2006)的“逐件转移”观点,我至少以两种方式扩展了现有的建构主义对转移的解释。首先,我展示了概念投影的概念(diSessa&Wagner,2005; Wagner,200663。Wagner,JF2006。片段转移。认知与指导,24:1-71。[Taylor&Francis Online],[Web (查看所有参考文献)揭示了细化的转移机制,这些机制展示了人们如何构造情况,并详细说明了皮亚杰同化和适应的过程。其次,我研究了专家认为单个数学概念或原理是如何通过各种同化认知资源而被认识的,这些资源的实用性受上下文因素的影响。就是说,一个人可能会在感知两种工作原理相同的数学原理的同时以不同的方式构造两个上下文不同的情况。同样,即使一个人在不同情况下的结构不同,也可能有两个或两个以上的人就特定数学概念的相关性达成共识。查看全文下载全文相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact: ,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.505138

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号