首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Learning Sciences >Achieving Alignment of Perspectival Framings in Problem-Solving Discourse
【24h】

Achieving Alignment of Perspectival Framings in Problem-Solving Discourse

机译:解决问题的话语中实现透视框架的对齐

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We use a concept of framing to explain 3 cases in which participants initially lacked mutual understanding but then achieved significant mutual understanding. The cases were all consistent with a pattern of positional framing that includes a human participant who is inquiring, which we call a listener, and a source, which may be another human participant or a non-human system. Participants with these different positionings have different perspectives that shape the interpretations and functions of their contributions. We hypothesize that achievement of mutual understanding also depends on participants having epistemological and conceptual framings that are sufficiently aligned. We distinguish between cases in which the participants achieved alignment of conceptual framing by adopting a schema that was in their common ground, cases in which the participants co-constructed a coherent framing without the benefit of a prefabricated schema (by constraint satisfaction, we hypothesize), and cases in which mutual understanding involved a refinement that did not require reframing. We argue that our hypotheses qualify as explanatory mechanisms, and we explicate this in an appendix.Our general goal is to contribute to the growing body of scientific studies that include concepts and methods for understanding cognitive structures and processes integrated with concepts and methods for understanding interaction that people have with each other and with other material and informational systems. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of the Journal of the Learning Sciences for the following free supplemental resource: “A Mechanistic Analysis of Discourse,” which presents an analysis of an episode from Case #1 of this article as a more detailed example of the kind of mechanism we have hypothesized in our more general accounts of interaction presented in the article.]View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.639000
机译:我们使用成帧的概念来解释3种情况,在这种情况下,参与者最初缺乏相互了解,但随后又取得了重要的相互了解。这些案例都与位置构架的模式一致,该构架包括正在询问的人类参与者(我们称为监听者)和来源(可能是另一个人类参与者或非人类系统)。具有这些不同定位的参与者具有不同的观点,这些观点塑造了他们的贡献的解释和功能。我们假设,相互理解的实现还取决于参与者的认识论和概念框架充分吻合。我们区分了参与者采用共同立场的模式实现概念框架对齐的情况,以及参与者在没有预制模式好处的情况下共同构建一致框架的情况(通过约束满足,我们假设) ,以及相互理解涉及无需重新定义的改进的情况。我们认为我们的假设符合解释机制,我们在附录中对此进行了说明。我们的总体目标是促进科学研究的发展,其中包括用于理解认知结构的概念和方法以及与理解相互作用的概念和方法相集成的过程人们彼此之间以及与其他材料和信息系统之间的联系。 [本文提供补充材料。请访问出版商的《学习科学杂志》在线版,以获取以下免费的补充资源:“话语的机械分析”,该文章对本文案例1中的一集进行了详细分析。我们在本文提供的更一般的交互说明中假设了这种机制的示例。]查看全文下载全文相关的变量add add_id ,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布编号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.639000

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号