首页> 外文期刊>Journal of international relations and development >Locating the normative within economic science: towards the analysis of hidden discourses of democracy in international politics
【24h】

Locating the normative within economic science: towards the analysis of hidden discourses of democracy in international politics

机译:在经济科学中定位规范:分析国际政治中民主的隐藏话语

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Economic science has been overwhelmingly perceived as a 'positive' science, both among economists and many scholars in other social sciences. As a result, there has been an estrangement between the 'scientific' study of economics and the study of 'fuzzier' matters of normative nature. Crucially, it is often assumed that economists - whether academics or practitioners - have little to say about democracy, a concept that is famously normative and contested in nature. This article argues that this perception is mistaken and misleading. When several key figures in economic science are examined in detail, we can see that their economic theories are, in fact, deeply intertwined with certain normative visions of democracy, even if implicitly. Recognising the role of hidden normative theories of democracy within economic science perspectives is important theoretically, in re-reading the nature and scope of economic science discourses. It is also, however, important in understanding some key world political trends. It is argued here that we are in a better position to understand the curious 'dabbling' of global financial organisations in matters of 'political nature' when we remain attuned to the role of hidden democratic assumptions. Also, the complex role of these organisations in 'democracy promotion', and the nature of democracy promotion itself, can thus be better appreciated.
机译:在经济学家和其他社会科学领域的许多学者中,经济学几乎都被视为“积极”科学。结果,在经济学的“科学”研究与规范性的“模糊”问题之间存在着隔range。至关重要的是,通常认为经济学家(无论是学者还是从业者)对民主几乎无话可说,民主这一概念在自然界是著名的规范性和争议性。本文认为,这种看法是错误和误导的。当详细研究经济科学中的几个关键人物时,我们可以看到,它们的经济理论实际上与某些民主的规范性愿景紧密相连,即使隐含地也是如此。从理论上重新认识经济理论话语的本质和范围,从经济科学角度认识隐含的规范性民主理论的作用很重要。但是,这对于理解一些重要的世界政治趋势也很重要。在这里争论的是,当我们继续关注隐蔽的民主假设的作用时,我们更容易理解全球金融组织在“政治性质”问题上的好奇“捣蛋”。此外,这些组织在“民主促进”中的复杂作用以及民主促进本身的性质也因此可以得到更好的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号