首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Money and Finance >Does transparency pay? Evidence from IMF data transparency policy reforms and emerging market sovereign bond spreads
【24h】

Does transparency pay? Evidence from IMF data transparency policy reforms and emerging market sovereign bond spreads

机译:透明度能赚钱吗?来自基金组织数据透明性政策改革和新兴市场主权债券利差的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Does an effort to enhance data transparency pay? We answer this question by analyzing the effect of the data transparency policy reforms, as reflected in subscriptions to the IMF's Data Standards Initiatives, namely, the Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) and the General Data Dissemination System (GDDS), on the spreads of emerging market sovereign bonds. Employing a short-run event study with daily data, we convincingly show that market participants react to the transparency reform news positively. We then measure its medium-term effect, which is more relevant for economic decisions. By showing that the reform decision is largely independent of a country's macroeconomic development we mitigate endogeneity issues regarding a decision to adopt such reforms. On average, the adoption of the SDDS and GDDS lead to a 13% reduction in the spreads over one year, following such reforms. This finding is robust to various sensitivity tests, including careful consideration of overlapping events, controlling for additional variables, and a placebo test. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:是否有努力提高数据透明度?我们通过分析数据透明度政策改革的影响来回答这个问题,这反映在对IMF数据标准倡议(特别数据发布标准(SDDS)和通用数据发布系统(GDDS))的订阅对新兴市场主权债券。通过使用每日数据进行的短期事件研究,我们令人信服地表明,市场参与者对透明度改革的消息反应积极。然后,我们测量其中期影响,这一影响与经济决策更为相关。通过表明改革决定很大程度上独立于一个国家的宏观经济发展,我们减轻了采用此类改革决定的内生性问题。在进行此类改革后,平均而言,采用SDDS和GDDS可以使一年的利差降低13%。这一发现对于各种敏感性测试均十分可靠,包括仔细考虑重叠事件,控制其他变量以及进行安慰剂测试。 (C)2018由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号