首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money >Do liquidity proxies measure liquidity accurately in ETFs?
【24h】

Do liquidity proxies measure liquidity accurately in ETFs?

机译:流动性代理是否可以准确地衡量ETF的流动性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We document the performance of liquidity proxies in ETFs. Most proxies are developed for use in equities. However, ETFs have lower asymmetric information, more algorithmic trading, and an active primary market where units are frequently created and redeemed. Using a comprehensive database of over 600 ETFs, we find that despite the differences between ETF and stock liquidity, proxies such as Daily Spread, High-Low, Close-High-Low, and Amihud all do a good job of capturing changes in effective and quoted spread transaction costs. However, no proxies accurately reflect movements in price impact or the level of actual transaction costs. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们记录了ETF中流动性代理的表现。大多数代理被开发用于股票。但是,ETF的信息不对称性较低,算法交易更多,并且活跃的一级市场频繁创建和赎回单位。通过使用包含600多种ETF的综合数据库,我们发现,尽管ETF和股票流动性之间存在差异,但诸如每日价差,高低,收市高低和Amihud之类的代理都可以很好地捕捉有效和无效的变化。报价差价交易成本。但是,没有代理可以准确反映价格影响或实际交易成本水平的变动。 (C)2018 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号