...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of information technology research >Comparison of Tied-Mixture and State-Clustered HMMs with Respect to Recognition Performance and Training Method
【24h】

Comparison of Tied-Mixture and State-Clustered HMMs with Respect to Recognition Performance and Training Method

机译:混合式和状态簇式HMM在识别性能和训练方法方面的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Tied-mixture HMMs have been proposed as the acoustic model for large-vocabulary continuous speech recognition and have yielded promising results. They share base-distribution and provide more flexibility in choosing the degree of tying than state-clustered HMMs. However, it is unclear which acoustic models to superior to the other under the same training data. Moreover, LBG algorithm and EM algorithm, which are the usual training methods for HMMs, have not been compared. Therefore in this paper, the recognition performance of the respective HMMs and the respective training methods are compared under the same condition. It was found that the number of parameters and the word error rate for both HMMs are equivalent when the number of codebooks is sufficiently large. It was also found that training method using the LBG algorithm achieves a 90% reduction in training time compared to training method using the EM algorithm, without degradation of recognition accuracy.
机译:提出了混合混合HMM作为大词汇量连续语音识别的声学模型,并产生了可喜的结果。与状态群集的HMM相比,它们共享基本分布,并在选择绑定程度方面提供更大的灵活性。但是,尚不清楚在相同的训练数据下哪个声学模型优于其他声学模型。此外,尚未对HMM常用的训练方法LBG算法和EM算法进行比较。因此,本文在相同条件下比较了各个HMM的识别性能和训练方法。已经发现,当码本的数量足够大时,两个HMM的参数数量和字错误率是相等的。还发现与使用EM算法的训练方法相比,使用LBG算法的训练方法可将训练时间减少90%,而不会降低识别精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号