首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Rights >Weighing the Costs of Accountability: The Role of Institutional Incentives in Pursuing Transitional Justice
【24h】

Weighing the Costs of Accountability: The Role of Institutional Incentives in Pursuing Transitional Justice

机译:权衡问责成本:制度激励在追求过渡司法中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this manuscript I challenge the central argument that transitional justice in post-repressive states is largely a function of the relative power of new versus old elites. I argue instead that a new regime's will to pursue transitional justice is closely linked to its capacity to provide goods and services expected by voters, and that institutional variation plays an important role in determining how this process plays out. The mechanisms that post-oppositionists utilize to enhance their long-term political viability depend primarily on institutionally determined reward structures, which should also determine support and opposition to a given justice policy. I evaluate this argument with an in-depth examination of elite perceptions concerning transitional justice policies in two diverse post-communist states: Poland and Serbia.
机译:在这篇手稿中,我挑战中心论点,即压制后国家的过渡司法很大程度上取决于新老精英的相对权力。相反,我认为,新政权追求过渡司法的意愿与其提供选民期望的商品和服务的能力紧密相关,而制度上的差异在决定这一过程如何发挥作用方面起着重要作用。后反对派用来提高其长期政治生存能力的机制主要取决于制度上确定的奖励结构,这也应确定对既定司法政策的支持和反对。我通过深入研究关于两个后共产主义国家(波兰和塞尔维亚)有关过渡时期司法政策的精英观念,来评估这一论点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Human Rights》 |2008年第4期|353-375|共23页
  • 作者

    Brian Grodsky;

  • 作者单位

    University of Maryland,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:13:22

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号