...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Historical Geography >Brutes, beasts and empire: veterinary medicine and environmental policy in French North Africa and British India
【24h】

Brutes, beasts and empire: veterinary medicine and environmental policy in French North Africa and British India

机译:兽,兽和帝国:法国北非和英属印度的兽医和环境政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The deep, and persistent, colonial roots of many contemporary environmental policies around the world have been increasingly recognized over the last decade. Research in the sectors of agriculture, forestry, human medicine, and public health has illuminated how environmental policies were constructed and utilized during the colonial period, as well as how many of these policies remain influential today. This paper examines the as yet little explored contribution of colonial veterinary medicine to the development and implementation of environmental policy. By comparing the experiences of the French in North Africa and the British in India, it demonstrates that some colonial veterinarians had a great deal of influence on environmental policy while others had very little. In French North Africa veterinarians played a significant role in developing rangeland management policies that impacted large swaths of these three territories, policies that can still be felt today. In British India, by contrast, the role of colonial veterinarians in developing environmental policy was much more circumscribed and, in the end, largely inconsequential. The paper suggests that three primary factors account for most of this dissimilarity: the differences in animal diseases present in India and the Maghreb; the differences between French and British veterinary education before the twentieth century; and the differences in colonial administration between the two European powers.
机译:在过去的十年中,全世界许多当代环境政策的深刻而持久的殖民根源已得到越来越多的认可。在农业,林业,人类医学和公共卫生领域的研究表明,在殖民时期如何构建和利用环境政策,以及今天有多少政策仍然具有影响力。本文研究了殖民地兽医学对环境政策制定和实施的探索性贡献。通过比较北非的法国人和印度的英国人的经验,它表明,一些殖民地兽医对环境政策有很大的影响,而另一些则很少。在法国北非,兽医在制定牧场管理政策方面发挥了重要作用,这些政策影响了这三个领地的大部分地区,这些政策至今仍然可以感觉到。相比之下,在英属印度,殖民地兽医在制定环境政策中的作用受到了更大的限制,最终在很大程度上是无关紧要的。该论文认为,造成这种差异的主要原因是三个主要因素:印度和马格里布存在的动物疾病差异;二十世纪前法国和英国兽医教育之间的差异;以及两个欧洲大国之间在殖民管理上的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号