首页> 外文学位 >Ramparts of empire: India's north-west frontier and British imperialism, 1919-1947.
【24h】

Ramparts of empire: India's north-west frontier and British imperialism, 1919-1947.

机译:帝国的城墙:1919-1947年,印度的西北边境和英帝国主义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines the relationship between British perceptions and policies regarding India's North-West Frontier and its Pathan inhabitants and the decline of British power in the subcontinent from 1919 to 1947. Its central argument is that two key constituencies within the framework of British India, the officers of the Indian Army and the Indian Political Service, viewed the Frontier as the most crucial region within Britain's Indian Empire. Generations of British officers believed that this was the one place in India where the British could suffer a "knockout blow" from either external invasion or internal revolt. In light of this, when confronted by a full-scale Indian nationalist movement after the First World War, the British sought to seal off the Frontier from the rest of India.;Confident that they had inoculated the Frontier against nationalism, the British administration on the Frontier carried on as if it were 30 years earlier, fretting about possible Soviet expansion, tribal raids, and Afghan intrigues. This emphasis on external menaces proved costly, however, as it blinded the British to local discontent and the rapid growth of a Frontier nationalist movement by the end of the 1920s. When the Frontier administration belatedly realized that they faced a homegrown nationalist movement they responded with a combination of institutional paralysis and brutality that underscored the British belief that the region constituted the primary bulwark of the British Raj.;This violence proved counterproductive. It engendered wide-scale nationalist interest in the Frontier and effectively made British policy in the region a subject of All-Indian political debate. The British responded to mounting nationalist pressure in the 1930s by placing the Frontier at the center of their successful efforts to retain control of India's defence establishment. This was a short-lived stopgap, however. By the last decade of British rule much of the Frontier was under the administration of the Indian National Congress. Moreover, the British not only concluded that Indian public opinion must be taken into account when formulating policy, but that nationalist prescriptions for the "problem" of the North-West Frontier should be enacted.
机译:这项研究考察了英国对印度西北边境及其生路的居民的看法和政策与1919年至1947年该次大陆英国权力的下降之间的关系。其中心论点是,在英属印度框架内,有两个主要选区,即印度。印度陆军和印度政治局的军官们将边境视为英国印度帝国内最重要的地区。几代英国军官认为,这是在印度的一个地方,英国人可能会因外部入侵或内部叛乱而遭受“打击”。有鉴于此,英国在第一次世界大战后遭到全面的印度民族主义运动的打击时,英国试图将边境与印度其他地区隔离开来;确信他们已将边境接种在反对民族主义的影响下,英国政府边界似乎进行得比30年前要紧,对苏联可能的扩张,部落的突袭和阿富汗的阴谋感到担忧。然而,这种对外部威胁的强调被证明是昂贵的,因为它使英国人对当地的不满和到1920年代末边疆民族主义运动的迅速发展视而不见。当边疆政府迟迟意识到自己面对着本土的民族主义运动时,他们以机构瘫痪和野蛮相结合的应对方式,突显了英国人对该地区构成英属印度统治的主要堡垒的信念。这种暴力行为起了反作用。它在边界引起了广泛的民族主义兴趣,并有效地使英国在该地区的政策成为全印度政治辩论的主题。为了应对1930年代日益加剧的民族主义压力,英国将边境置于成功维持对印度国防部门控制权的中心位置。但是,这是短暂的权宜之计。到英国统治的最后十年,边疆地区的大部分地区都由印度国民议会管理。而且,英国人不仅得出结论,在制定政策时必须考虑印度的舆论,而且应该制定民族主义的西北边境“问题”处方。

著录项

  • 作者

    Marsh, Brandon Douglas.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Texas at Austin.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Texas at Austin.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.;Political Science International Relations.;Political Science International Law and Relations.;History Modern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 292 p.
  • 总页数 292
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号